Skip to main content
PermitBase

You are viewing the permanent link for the record currently in effect, published 2026-09-16.

Walla Walla building permits

Verified

Walla Walla, Washington — as published 2026-09-16.

Verified 2026-09-16 · Source

Codes adopted

IBC — WWMC 15.04.010: “The 2021 Edition of the International Building Code, published by the International Code Council, Inc., including the following appendices: Appendix A, Employee Qualifications; Appendix E, Supplementary Accessibility Requirements; Appendix F, Rodentproofing; Appendix G, Flood-Resistant Construction; Appendix H, Signs; Appendix I, Patio Covers; Appendix J, Grading; as amended by Chapter 51-50 of the Washington Administrative Code, is hereby adopted by reference and further amended as follows:”IMC — WWMC 15.04.011: “The 2021 Edition of the International Mechanical Code … except that the standards for liquified petroleum gas installations shall be the 2021 International Fuel Gas Code, and the 2020 Edition of NFPA 58 (Liquefied Petroleum Gas Code) and the 2020 Edition of ANSI Z223.1/NFPA 54 (National Fuel Gas Code), and as amended by Chapter 51-52 of the Washington Administrative Code”.UPC — WWMC 15.04.012: “The 2021 Edition of the Uniform Plumbing Code, published by the International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials”, with named appendices.IRC — WWMC 15.04.013: “The 2021 Edition of the International Residential Code, published by the International Code Council, Inc.”, with named appendices.ADOPTED BY SECTION TITLE BUT NOT OPENED FOR THIS ENTRY, so NO EDITION YEAR IS ASSERTED for any of them: International Green Construction Code (15.04.014), Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings (15.04.015), International Existing Building Code (15.04.016), International Fire Code (15.04.017), International Energy Conservation Code (15.04.018), International Fuel Gas Code (15.04.019), International Property Maintenance Code (15.04.020), International Swimming Pool and Spa Code (15.04.021) and International Wildland-Urban Interface Code (15.04.022).NO ELECTRICAL CODE IS ADOPTED ANYWHERE IN TITLE 15. Chapter 15.08 is published as “ELECTRICAL CODE (RESERVED)” and its page carries no sections.

Permit types & fees

Residential building permit

Verified

Permit to build, alter, add to or move a house or other residential structure in Walla Walla, under the International Residential Code adopted at WWMC 15.04.013.

Verified 2026-09-16 · Source

Requirements

  • WWMC 15.04.013 adopts “The 2021 Edition of the International Residential Code, published by the International Code Council, Inc.” with named appendices, as amended by the applicable Chapter 51-51 WAC layer.
  • THE DESIGN CRITERIA ARE IN THE GENERAL PROVISIONS, NOT IN AN AMENDED TABLE R301.2, which is where every other city in this Washington set puts them. WWMC 15.04.005(B) publishes: ground snow load 30 lbs./ft.2 with the note “Minimum roof snow load to be thirty lbs./ft.2 in the city of Walla Walla”; “110 mph ultimate wind speed for Residential/Commercial”; seismic design category D, with no sub-category where SeaTac publishes D2; weathering Severe; frost line depth 24 inches; termites Slight to Moderate; decay None to slight; winter design temperature 10 degrees; ice shield underlayment required; flood hazard given as “2003 1992 FIRM”, two years in one cell, quoted as printed; AIR FREEZE INDEX 1000; mean annual temperature 50.2 degrees.
  • THE CODE PUBLISHES ITS OWN TIE-BREAKER, AND THE ORDER IS EXPLICIT. WWMC 15.04.005(A): the general provisions beat any referenced code, and “In the event of conflict between the following identified codes, the code first listed shall have priority over those latter listed: the International Building Code, the International Residential Code, the International Mechanical Code, the International Fire Code, and, then, the Uniform Plumbing Code.” Wenatchee publishes the same idea in different words; the ORDER is what matters and it is specific to each city.
  • A THREE-TRIGGER EXPIRY, AND ANY ONE OF THEM VOIDS THE PERMIT. WWMC 15.04.005(G): “All permits shall expire by limitation and be declared void if: 1. Work is not started within one hundred eighty days of obtaining a permit, 2. Work is abandoned for one hundred eighty days or more after beginning work, or 3. After two years from the date of permit issuance, regardless of whether the work is finished.” The third is absolute — steady visible progress does not save a permit at two years. This matches the structure Puyallup and Wenatchee publish, and differs from SeaTac, which times a permit by what it builds rather than by whether work is happening.
  • RE-PERMITTING AFTER EXPIRY IS CHEAPER THAN A FRESH PERMIT, AND THE CODE PICKS THE CHEAPER OF TWO MEASURES FOR YOU. WWMC 15.04.005(G): “If a permit is expired for time, a new permit shall be obtained for one-half the permit fee or based on the value of the remainder of the work to finish the original permit, whichever is less.”
  • AN APPROVED APPLICATION CAN STILL GO VOID BEFORE YOU HOLD A PERMIT. WWMC 15.04.005(G): “When an applicant has been notified that their permit application has been approved and is ready to purchase, the applicant shall obtain the permit within thirty days of notification or said permit application shall become void.”
  • WWMC 15.04.005(F): “City of Walla Walla development permits shall be issued only to the property owner or the property owner's authorized agent.”
  • A LICENSED WASHINGTON DESIGN PROFESSIONAL IS REQUIRED ABOVE A SIZE THRESHOLD. WWMC 15.04.005(D) requires a Washington design professional licensed under Chapter 18.08 RCW, 308-12 WAC or 18.43 RCW to prepare or oversee plans for buildings at or above the threshold the subsection sets; the full threshold text runs past the extract read for this entry and the exact cut-off is NOT ASSERTED here.
  • WWMC 15.04.005(C): development in a designated flood plain “shall comply with Chapter 21.10 and the construction specifications detailed in Section R322 of the International Residential Code as incorporated by Section 15.04.013, as amended.” WWMC Chapter 21.10 was not opened for this entry.
  • THE ROLLING CLAUSE IS NOT IN THE ADOPTING SENTENCE — IT IS ITS OWN SECTION, AND A PHRASE-BASED AUDIT WOULD MISS IT. WWMC 15.04.030: “The amendment, addition or repeal of any section of any of the adopted codes, regulations, or statutes shall be deemed to amend this chapter and the codes, regulations, and statutes contained in this chapter are adopted by reference in conformity with the amendment, addition or repeal, and it shall not be necessary for the legislative authority of this city to take any action with respect to such addition, amendment or repeal as provided by RCW 35A.12.140.” MEASURED, NOT ASSUMED: a regular expression for the usual rolling formulations (“as now or hereafter amended”, “as the same exists”, “may hereafter be amended”, “as now in effect”) returns NOTHING across all 75,567 characters of Chapter 15.04. The years are named and the state layer still rolls; the two facts just live in different sections.

Required documents

  • RequiredBuilding permit applicationFiled under WWMC Chapter 15.04. Note two things that decide timing rather than approval: permits issue only to the property owner or their authorized agent (15.04.005(F)), and plan review fees at 65 percent of the permit fee plus any state surcharge are “due and payable upon filing of permit application” (15.04.050(A)(5)) — not at issuance.
  • RequiredProject valuation for fee calculationFees are computed from valuation under WWMC 15.04.050(A)(1), and the valuation basis is the ICC building valuation data table adopted at 15.04.005(H), which updates without the city amending its code. For roofing the valuation is defined by area instead: $200.00 per square where the existing roof is torn off, $100.00 per square for roofing over. Those per-square figures are VALUATION INPUTS, not the fee.
  • OptionalPlans prepared or overseen by a Washington design professionalRequired by WWMC 15.04.005(D) above the size threshold that subsection sets, for a professional licensed under Chapter 18.08 RCW, 308-12 WAC or 18.43 RCW. The exact threshold runs past the extract read for this entry and is not asserted.

Fee schedule

Fee typeAmountNotes
Building permit fee (valuation-based)From $30.00, tiered by valuation
WWMC 15.04.050(A)(1) publishes the whole schedule in dollars. Show full citation

WWMC 15.04.050(A)(1) publishes the whole schedule in dollars. Eight valuation tiers: $0.01–$500.00 is a flat $30.00; then $30.00 plus $3.61 per additional $100 to $2,000; $84.78 plus $16.95 per $1,000 to $25,000; $475.48 plus $12.26 per $1,000 to $50,000; $782.23 plus $8.49 per $1,000 to $100,000; $1,207.69 plus $6.80 per $1,000 to $500,000; $3,929.93 plus $5.77 per $1,000 to $1,000,000; and $6,816.23 plus $4.62 per $1,000 above that. >>> CONTINUITY CONTROL, RUN THIS SESSION AND REPORTED AS MEASURED RATHER THAN AS AN ERROR: 6 of the 7 tier boundaries are discontinuous, and EVERY DIFFERENCE IS POSITIVE — the next tier's published base always sits slightly above what the tier below it computes to. At $2,000 the lower tier yields $84.15 against a published $84.78 (+$0.63); at $25,000, $474.63 against $475.48 (+$0.85); at $50,000, $781.98 against $782.23 (+$0.25); at $100,000, $1,206.73 against $1,207.69 (+$0.96); at $500,000, $3,927.69 against $3,929.93 (+$2.24); at $1,000,000, $6,814.93 against $6,816.23 (+$1.30). Only the $500 boundary is exact. The check was run with a known-continuous control table that correctly reported zero. A one-directional residual is not what arithmetic slips look like, but this entry does not diagnose the cause and the city's published figures govern.

Plan review and state surcharge65% of permit fee, plus surcharge
TWO CHARGES SIT ON TOP OF EVERY PERMIT FEE AND NEITHER IS IN THE TIER TABLE. Show full citation

TWO CHARGES SIT ON TOP OF EVERY PERMIT FEE AND NEITHER IS IN THE TIER TABLE. WWMC 15.04.050(A)(5): “plan review fees in the amount of sixty-five percent of the applicable permit fee, plus state surcharges which may apply, shall be due and payable upon filing of permit application.” 15.04.050(A)(6) names the surcharges: $6.50 for building permits, $2.00 “for each additional unit for a building containing more than one residential unit”, and $25.00 for commercial building permits. So the cash due at application is roughly 1.65x the table figure plus a surcharge. WALLA WALLA AND LONGVIEW USE THE SAME PERCENTAGE SHAPE AND ONLY ONE OF THEM IS COMPUTABLE: Longview publishes 65/70/30 percent over a master fee schedule it does not print, while Walla Walla publishes both the percentage AND the base table it applies to.

Hourly and reinspection charges$65.00/hour or actual cost, if higher
THE PUBLISHED HOURLY RATE IS A FLOOR, NOT A PRICE. Show full citation

THE PUBLISHED HOURLY RATE IS A FLOOR, NOT A PRICE. WWMC 15.04.050(A)(7) charges $65.00 per hour for inspections outside normal business hours (two-hour minimum), reinspections, inspections for which no fee is specified, and additional plan review caused by changes (half-hour minimum) — but footnote 1 reads “Or the total hourly cost to the city of Walla Walla, whichever is greater. This cost shall include supervision, overhead, equipment, hourly wages and fringe benefits of the employees involved.” Quoting $65.00 per hour on its own would understate it. Outside consultants are billed at “Actual costs”, which footnote 2 says “include administrative and overhead costs.”

Valuation basisICC building valuation data table
THE RATE TABLE IS PUBLISHED AND THE VALUATION FEEDING IT IS DELEGATED, WHICH IS THE EXACT INVERSE OF SEATAC. Show full citation

THE RATE TABLE IS PUBLISHED AND THE VALUATION FEEDING IT IS DELEGATED, WHICH IS THE EXACT INVERSE OF SEATAC. WWMC 15.04.005(H): “the city of Walla Walla adopts by reference the most recent building valuation data (BVD) table published by the International Code Council, as amended. Any changes in the BVD table published by the International Code Council shall be deemed to be adopted by the city of Walla Walla without additional amendment to this subsection.” SeaTac publishes the valuation method and withholds the rate; Walla Walla publishes the rate and delegates the valuation input. Both leave a reader one step short of a final number, from opposite directions.

Commercial building permit

Verified

Permit for commercial, industrial and institutional construction in Walla Walla under the International Building Code adopted at WWMC 15.04.010.

Verified 2026-09-16 · Source

Requirements

  • WWMC 15.04.010: “The 2021 Edition of the International Building Code, published by the International Code Council, Inc., including the following appendices: Appendix A, Employee Qualifications; Appendix E, Supplementary Accessibility Requirements; Appendix F, Rodentproofing; Appendix G, Flood-Resistant Construction; Appendix H, Signs; Appendix I, Patio Covers; Appendix J, Grading; as amended by Chapter 51-50 of the Washington Administrative Code, is hereby adopted by reference and further amended as follows”. SEVEN APPENDICES IS THE LONGEST LIST IN THIS WASHINGTON SET — SeaTac, for comparison, names E and H.
  • APPEALS ARE WRITTEN INTO THE CODE ITSELF RATHER THAN LEFT TO A BOARD. WWMC 15.04.010(A) replaces IBC Section 113 so that “an aggrieved party may appeal to a Hearing Examiner” rather than to the Board of Appeals the model code contemplates.
  • The city also adopts the International Existing Building Code (15.04.016), the International Fire Code (15.04.017), the International Energy Conservation Code (15.04.018), the International Fuel Gas Code (15.04.019), the International Property Maintenance Code (15.04.020), the International Swimming Pool and Spa Code (15.04.021), the International Wildland-Urban Interface Code (15.04.022), and the Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings (15.04.015). Their individual adopting sentences were NOT opened for this entry and no edition year is asserted for any of them.
  • AN INTERNATIONAL GREEN CONSTRUCTION CODE IS ADOPTED AT WWMC 15.04.014 — no other city in this Washington set names one. Its adopting sentence was not opened and its edition year and scope are not asserted here.
  • THE CODE PUBLISHES ITS OWN TIE-BREAKER, AND THE ORDER IS EXPLICIT. WWMC 15.04.005(A): the general provisions beat any referenced code, and “In the event of conflict between the following identified codes, the code first listed shall have priority over those latter listed: the International Building Code, the International Residential Code, the International Mechanical Code, the International Fire Code, and, then, the Uniform Plumbing Code.” Wenatchee publishes the same idea in different words; the ORDER is what matters and it is specific to each city.
  • A THREE-TRIGGER EXPIRY, AND ANY ONE OF THEM VOIDS THE PERMIT. WWMC 15.04.005(G): “All permits shall expire by limitation and be declared void if: 1. Work is not started within one hundred eighty days of obtaining a permit, 2. Work is abandoned for one hundred eighty days or more after beginning work, or 3. After two years from the date of permit issuance, regardless of whether the work is finished.” The third is absolute — steady visible progress does not save a permit at two years. This matches the structure Puyallup and Wenatchee publish, and differs from SeaTac, which times a permit by what it builds rather than by whether work is happening.
  • RE-PERMITTING AFTER EXPIRY IS CHEAPER THAN A FRESH PERMIT, AND THE CODE PICKS THE CHEAPER OF TWO MEASURES FOR YOU. WWMC 15.04.005(G): “If a permit is expired for time, a new permit shall be obtained for one-half the permit fee or based on the value of the remainder of the work to finish the original permit, whichever is less.”
  • AN APPROVED APPLICATION CAN STILL GO VOID BEFORE YOU HOLD A PERMIT. WWMC 15.04.005(G): “When an applicant has been notified that their permit application has been approved and is ready to purchase, the applicant shall obtain the permit within thirty days of notification or said permit application shall become void.”
  • WWMC 15.04.005(F): “City of Walla Walla development permits shall be issued only to the property owner or the property owner's authorized agent.”
  • A LICENSED WASHINGTON DESIGN PROFESSIONAL IS REQUIRED ABOVE A SIZE THRESHOLD. WWMC 15.04.005(D) requires a Washington design professional licensed under Chapter 18.08 RCW, 308-12 WAC or 18.43 RCW to prepare or oversee plans for buildings at or above the threshold the subsection sets; the full threshold text runs past the extract read for this entry and the exact cut-off is NOT ASSERTED here.
  • THE ROLLING CLAUSE IS NOT IN THE ADOPTING SENTENCE — IT IS ITS OWN SECTION, AND A PHRASE-BASED AUDIT WOULD MISS IT. WWMC 15.04.030: “The amendment, addition or repeal of any section of any of the adopted codes, regulations, or statutes shall be deemed to amend this chapter and the codes, regulations, and statutes contained in this chapter are adopted by reference in conformity with the amendment, addition or repeal, and it shall not be necessary for the legislative authority of this city to take any action with respect to such addition, amendment or repeal as provided by RCW 35A.12.140.” MEASURED, NOT ASSUMED: a regular expression for the usual rolling formulations (“as now or hereafter amended”, “as the same exists”, “may hereafter be amended”, “as now in effect”) returns NOTHING across all 75,567 characters of Chapter 15.04. The years are named and the state layer still rolls; the two facts just live in different sections.

Required documents

  • RequiredBuilding permit applicationFiled under WWMC Chapter 15.04. Note two things that decide timing rather than approval: permits issue only to the property owner or their authorized agent (15.04.005(F)), and plan review fees at 65 percent of the permit fee plus any state surcharge are “due and payable upon filing of permit application” (15.04.050(A)(5)) — not at issuance.
  • RequiredProject valuation for fee calculationFees are computed from valuation under WWMC 15.04.050(A)(1), and the valuation basis is the ICC building valuation data table adopted at 15.04.005(H), which updates without the city amending its code. For roofing the valuation is defined by area instead: $200.00 per square where the existing roof is torn off, $100.00 per square for roofing over. Those per-square figures are VALUATION INPUTS, not the fee.
  • OptionalPlans prepared or overseen by a Washington design professionalRequired by WWMC 15.04.005(D) above the size threshold that subsection sets, for a professional licensed under Chapter 18.08 RCW, 308-12 WAC or 18.43 RCW. The exact threshold runs past the extract read for this entry and is not asserted.

Fee schedule

Fee typeAmountNotes
Building permit fee (valuation-based)From $30.00, tiered by valuation
WWMC 15.04.050(A)(1) publishes the whole schedule in dollars. Show full citation

WWMC 15.04.050(A)(1) publishes the whole schedule in dollars. Eight valuation tiers: $0.01–$500.00 is a flat $30.00; then $30.00 plus $3.61 per additional $100 to $2,000; $84.78 plus $16.95 per $1,000 to $25,000; $475.48 plus $12.26 per $1,000 to $50,000; $782.23 plus $8.49 per $1,000 to $100,000; $1,207.69 plus $6.80 per $1,000 to $500,000; $3,929.93 plus $5.77 per $1,000 to $1,000,000; and $6,816.23 plus $4.62 per $1,000 above that. >>> CONTINUITY CONTROL, RUN THIS SESSION AND REPORTED AS MEASURED RATHER THAN AS AN ERROR: 6 of the 7 tier boundaries are discontinuous, and EVERY DIFFERENCE IS POSITIVE — the next tier's published base always sits slightly above what the tier below it computes to. At $2,000 the lower tier yields $84.15 against a published $84.78 (+$0.63); at $25,000, $474.63 against $475.48 (+$0.85); at $50,000, $781.98 against $782.23 (+$0.25); at $100,000, $1,206.73 against $1,207.69 (+$0.96); at $500,000, $3,927.69 against $3,929.93 (+$2.24); at $1,000,000, $6,814.93 against $6,816.23 (+$1.30). Only the $500 boundary is exact. The check was run with a known-continuous control table that correctly reported zero. A one-directional residual is not what arithmetic slips look like, but this entry does not diagnose the cause and the city's published figures govern.

Plan review and state surcharge65% of permit fee, plus surcharge
TWO CHARGES SIT ON TOP OF EVERY PERMIT FEE AND NEITHER IS IN THE TIER TABLE. Show full citation

TWO CHARGES SIT ON TOP OF EVERY PERMIT FEE AND NEITHER IS IN THE TIER TABLE. WWMC 15.04.050(A)(5): “plan review fees in the amount of sixty-five percent of the applicable permit fee, plus state surcharges which may apply, shall be due and payable upon filing of permit application.” 15.04.050(A)(6) names the surcharges: $6.50 for building permits, $2.00 “for each additional unit for a building containing more than one residential unit”, and $25.00 for commercial building permits. So the cash due at application is roughly 1.65x the table figure plus a surcharge. WALLA WALLA AND LONGVIEW USE THE SAME PERCENTAGE SHAPE AND ONLY ONE OF THEM IS COMPUTABLE: Longview publishes 65/70/30 percent over a master fee schedule it does not print, while Walla Walla publishes both the percentage AND the base table it applies to.

Hourly and reinspection charges$65.00/hour or actual cost, if higher
THE PUBLISHED HOURLY RATE IS A FLOOR, NOT A PRICE. Show full citation

THE PUBLISHED HOURLY RATE IS A FLOOR, NOT A PRICE. WWMC 15.04.050(A)(7) charges $65.00 per hour for inspections outside normal business hours (two-hour minimum), reinspections, inspections for which no fee is specified, and additional plan review caused by changes (half-hour minimum) — but footnote 1 reads “Or the total hourly cost to the city of Walla Walla, whichever is greater. This cost shall include supervision, overhead, equipment, hourly wages and fringe benefits of the employees involved.” Quoting $65.00 per hour on its own would understate it. Outside consultants are billed at “Actual costs”, which footnote 2 says “include administrative and overhead costs.”

Valuation basisICC building valuation data table
THE RATE TABLE IS PUBLISHED AND THE VALUATION FEEDING IT IS DELEGATED, WHICH IS THE EXACT INVERSE OF SEATAC. Show full citation

THE RATE TABLE IS PUBLISHED AND THE VALUATION FEEDING IT IS DELEGATED, WHICH IS THE EXACT INVERSE OF SEATAC. WWMC 15.04.005(H): “the city of Walla Walla adopts by reference the most recent building valuation data (BVD) table published by the International Code Council, as amended. Any changes in the BVD table published by the International Code Council shall be deemed to be adopted by the city of Walla Walla without additional amendment to this subsection.” SeaTac publishes the valuation method and withholds the rate; Walla Walla publishes the rate and delegates the valuation input. Both leave a reader one step short of a final number, from opposite directions.

Mechanical permit

Verified

Permit for heating, ventilation, air conditioning and fuel-gas equipment in Walla Walla under the International Mechanical Code adopted at WWMC 15.04.011.

Verified 2026-09-16 · Source

Requirements

  • WWMC 15.04.011 adopts “The 2021 Edition of the International Mechanical Code, published by the International Code Council, Inc., except that the standards for liquified petroleum gas installations shall be the 2021 International Fuel Gas Code, and the 2020 Edition of NFPA 58 (Liquefied Petroleum Gas Code) and the 2020 Edition of ANSI Z223.1/NFPA 54 (National Fuel Gas Code), and as amended by Chapter 51-52 of the Washington Administrative Code”.
  • >>> FOUR EDITION YEARS SIT IN THAT ONE SENTENCE AND THEY SORT BY PUBLISHER, NOT BY DRAFTING ACCIDENT: the two ICC documents (IMC, IFGC) are both 2021 and the two NFPA documents (NFPA 58, NFPA 54) are both 2020. That is a mechanism a reader can check rather than a typo to explain away — the two houses run separate revision cycles. IT IS RECORDED AS A HYPOTHESIS AND NOT AS A FINDING, because University Place names NFPA 58 at 2021 and so contradicts it directly.
  • WWMC 15.04.011(A) replaces IMC Section 109.2 so that “The fees for mechanical work shall be as indicated in subsection 15.04.050(B) of the Walla Walla Municipal Code”, and (B) removes Sections 109.4 and 109.6.
  • PUBLISHED AS PRINTED, AND THE TWO HALVES DISAGREE: WWMC 15.04.011(C) says “Amend Section 113 to read as follows” and the text it inserts is headed “SECTION 109 MEANS OF APPEAL” with a body numbered 113.1. The instruction names 113 and the heading names 109. Quoted as published; not corrected here.
  • THE CODE PUBLISHES ITS OWN TIE-BREAKER, AND THE ORDER IS EXPLICIT. WWMC 15.04.005(A): the general provisions beat any referenced code, and “In the event of conflict between the following identified codes, the code first listed shall have priority over those latter listed: the International Building Code, the International Residential Code, the International Mechanical Code, the International Fire Code, and, then, the Uniform Plumbing Code.” Wenatchee publishes the same idea in different words; the ORDER is what matters and it is specific to each city.
  • A THREE-TRIGGER EXPIRY, AND ANY ONE OF THEM VOIDS THE PERMIT. WWMC 15.04.005(G): “All permits shall expire by limitation and be declared void if: 1. Work is not started within one hundred eighty days of obtaining a permit, 2. Work is abandoned for one hundred eighty days or more after beginning work, or 3. After two years from the date of permit issuance, regardless of whether the work is finished.” The third is absolute — steady visible progress does not save a permit at two years. This matches the structure Puyallup and Wenatchee publish, and differs from SeaTac, which times a permit by what it builds rather than by whether work is happening.
  • AN APPROVED APPLICATION CAN STILL GO VOID BEFORE YOU HOLD A PERMIT. WWMC 15.04.005(G): “When an applicant has been notified that their permit application has been approved and is ready to purchase, the applicant shall obtain the permit within thirty days of notification or said permit application shall become void.”
  • THE ROLLING CLAUSE IS NOT IN THE ADOPTING SENTENCE — IT IS ITS OWN SECTION, AND A PHRASE-BASED AUDIT WOULD MISS IT. WWMC 15.04.030: “The amendment, addition or repeal of any section of any of the adopted codes, regulations, or statutes shall be deemed to amend this chapter and the codes, regulations, and statutes contained in this chapter are adopted by reference in conformity with the amendment, addition or repeal, and it shall not be necessary for the legislative authority of this city to take any action with respect to such addition, amendment or repeal as provided by RCW 35A.12.140.” MEASURED, NOT ASSUMED: a regular expression for the usual rolling formulations (“as now or hereafter amended”, “as the same exists”, “may hereafter be amended”, “as now in effect”) returns NOTHING across all 75,567 characters of Chapter 15.04. The years are named and the state layer still rolls; the two facts just live in different sections.

Required documents

  • RequiredBuilding permit applicationFiled under WWMC Chapter 15.04. Note two things that decide timing rather than approval: permits issue only to the property owner or their authorized agent (15.04.005(F)), and plan review fees at 65 percent of the permit fee plus any state surcharge are “due and payable upon filing of permit application” (15.04.050(A)(5)) — not at issuance.
  • RequiredProject valuation for fee calculationFees are computed from valuation under WWMC 15.04.050(A)(1), and the valuation basis is the ICC building valuation data table adopted at 15.04.005(H), which updates without the city amending its code. For roofing the valuation is defined by area instead: $200.00 per square where the existing roof is torn off, $100.00 per square for roofing over. Those per-square figures are VALUATION INPUTS, not the fee.

Fee schedule

Fee typeAmountNotes
Mechanical permit issuance$26.00 issuance plus per-item fees
WWMC 15.04.050(B)(1) states the issuance fee IN WORDS — “For issuing each permit: twenty-six dollars.” — with no dollar sign anywhere in the sentence. Show full citation

WWMC 15.04.050(B)(1) states the issuance fee IN WORDS — “For issuing each permit: twenty-six dollars.” — with no dollar sign anywhere in the sentence. A per-item schedule then applies on top under (B)(2): gas piping $10.00, a furnace under 100,000 BTU $20.00, a furnace over 100,000 BTU $20.00, and further items. Plan review at 65 percent and any state surcharge are additional.

Plan review and state surcharge65% of permit fee, plus surcharge
TWO CHARGES SIT ON TOP OF EVERY PERMIT FEE AND NEITHER IS IN THE TIER TABLE. Show full citation

TWO CHARGES SIT ON TOP OF EVERY PERMIT FEE AND NEITHER IS IN THE TIER TABLE. WWMC 15.04.050(A)(5): “plan review fees in the amount of sixty-five percent of the applicable permit fee, plus state surcharges which may apply, shall be due and payable upon filing of permit application.” 15.04.050(A)(6) names the surcharges: $6.50 for building permits, $2.00 “for each additional unit for a building containing more than one residential unit”, and $25.00 for commercial building permits. So the cash due at application is roughly 1.65x the table figure plus a surcharge. WALLA WALLA AND LONGVIEW USE THE SAME PERCENTAGE SHAPE AND ONLY ONE OF THEM IS COMPUTABLE: Longview publishes 65/70/30 percent over a master fee schedule it does not print, while Walla Walla publishes both the percentage AND the base table it applies to.

Hourly and reinspection charges$65.00/hour or actual cost, if higher
THE PUBLISHED HOURLY RATE IS A FLOOR, NOT A PRICE. Show full citation

THE PUBLISHED HOURLY RATE IS A FLOOR, NOT A PRICE. WWMC 15.04.050(A)(7) charges $65.00 per hour for inspections outside normal business hours (two-hour minimum), reinspections, inspections for which no fee is specified, and additional plan review caused by changes (half-hour minimum) — but footnote 1 reads “Or the total hourly cost to the city of Walla Walla, whichever is greater. This cost shall include supervision, overhead, equipment, hourly wages and fringe benefits of the employees involved.” Quoting $65.00 per hour on its own would understate it. Outside consultants are billed at “Actual costs”, which footnote 2 says “include administrative and overhead costs.”

Plumbing permit

Verified

Permit for plumbing installations in Walla Walla under the Uniform Plumbing Code adopted at WWMC 15.04.012.

Verified 2026-09-16 · Source

Requirements

  • WWMC 15.04.012 adopts “The 2021 Edition of the Uniform Plumbing Code, published by the International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials”, including named appendices beginning with Appendix A (Recommended Rules for Sizing the Water Supply System) and Appendix B (Explanatory Notes on Combination Waste and Vent Systems).
  • The Uniform Plumbing Code is LAST in the city's own conflict-priority order at WWMC 15.04.005(A) — behind the IBC, IRC, IMC and IFC — so where it conflicts with any of those, it yields.
  • A THREE-TRIGGER EXPIRY, AND ANY ONE OF THEM VOIDS THE PERMIT. WWMC 15.04.005(G): “All permits shall expire by limitation and be declared void if: 1. Work is not started within one hundred eighty days of obtaining a permit, 2. Work is abandoned for one hundred eighty days or more after beginning work, or 3. After two years from the date of permit issuance, regardless of whether the work is finished.” The third is absolute — steady visible progress does not save a permit at two years. This matches the structure Puyallup and Wenatchee publish, and differs from SeaTac, which times a permit by what it builds rather than by whether work is happening.
  • AN APPROVED APPLICATION CAN STILL GO VOID BEFORE YOU HOLD A PERMIT. WWMC 15.04.005(G): “When an applicant has been notified that their permit application has been approved and is ready to purchase, the applicant shall obtain the permit within thirty days of notification or said permit application shall become void.”
  • THE ROLLING CLAUSE IS NOT IN THE ADOPTING SENTENCE — IT IS ITS OWN SECTION, AND A PHRASE-BASED AUDIT WOULD MISS IT. WWMC 15.04.030: “The amendment, addition or repeal of any section of any of the adopted codes, regulations, or statutes shall be deemed to amend this chapter and the codes, regulations, and statutes contained in this chapter are adopted by reference in conformity with the amendment, addition or repeal, and it shall not be necessary for the legislative authority of this city to take any action with respect to such addition, amendment or repeal as provided by RCW 35A.12.140.” MEASURED, NOT ASSUMED: a regular expression for the usual rolling formulations (“as now or hereafter amended”, “as the same exists”, “may hereafter be amended”, “as now in effect”) returns NOTHING across all 75,567 characters of Chapter 15.04. The years are named and the state layer still rolls; the two facts just live in different sections.

Required documents

  • RequiredBuilding permit applicationFiled under WWMC Chapter 15.04. Note two things that decide timing rather than approval: permits issue only to the property owner or their authorized agent (15.04.005(F)), and plan review fees at 65 percent of the permit fee plus any state surcharge are “due and payable upon filing of permit application” (15.04.050(A)(5)) — not at issuance.
  • RequiredProject valuation for fee calculationFees are computed from valuation under WWMC 15.04.050(A)(1), and the valuation basis is the ICC building valuation data table adopted at 15.04.005(H), which updates without the city amending its code. For roofing the valuation is defined by area instead: $200.00 per square where the existing roof is torn off, $100.00 per square for roofing over. Those per-square figures are VALUATION INPUTS, not the fee.

Fee schedule

Fee typeAmountNotes
Plumbing permit issuance$23.00 issuance plus per-fixture fees
WWMC 15.04.050(C)(1) states both issuance fees IN WORDS: “For issuing each permit: twenty-three dollars” and “For issuing each supplemental permit: thirteen dollars.” A per-fixture schedule then… Show full citation

WWMC 15.04.050(C)(1) states both issuance fees IN WORDS: “For issuing each permit: twenty-three dollars” and “For issuing each supplemental permit: thirteen dollars.” A per-fixture schedule then applies under (C)(2), almost all of it at $10.00 — water closet, lavatory, shower, bathtub, kitchen sink, laundry sink, floor drain, clothes washer, dishwasher, disposal, water piping, lawn irrigation backflow, drinking fountain, hose bibs, electric water heater, sump pump, miscellaneous sink, gas piping, urinal, miscellaneous fixtures, drain/waste/vent piping and grease trap — with the building sewer the one $20.00 item. Plan review at 65 percent and any state surcharge are additional.

Plan review and state surcharge65% of permit fee, plus surcharge
TWO CHARGES SIT ON TOP OF EVERY PERMIT FEE AND NEITHER IS IN THE TIER TABLE. Show full citation

TWO CHARGES SIT ON TOP OF EVERY PERMIT FEE AND NEITHER IS IN THE TIER TABLE. WWMC 15.04.050(A)(5): “plan review fees in the amount of sixty-five percent of the applicable permit fee, plus state surcharges which may apply, shall be due and payable upon filing of permit application.” 15.04.050(A)(6) names the surcharges: $6.50 for building permits, $2.00 “for each additional unit for a building containing more than one residential unit”, and $25.00 for commercial building permits. So the cash due at application is roughly 1.65x the table figure plus a surcharge. WALLA WALLA AND LONGVIEW USE THE SAME PERCENTAGE SHAPE AND ONLY ONE OF THEM IS COMPUTABLE: Longview publishes 65/70/30 percent over a master fee schedule it does not print, while Walla Walla publishes both the percentage AND the base table it applies to.

Hourly and reinspection charges$65.00/hour or actual cost, if higher
THE PUBLISHED HOURLY RATE IS A FLOOR, NOT A PRICE. Show full citation

THE PUBLISHED HOURLY RATE IS A FLOOR, NOT A PRICE. WWMC 15.04.050(A)(7) charges $65.00 per hour for inspections outside normal business hours (two-hour minimum), reinspections, inspections for which no fee is specified, and additional plan review caused by changes (half-hour minimum) — but footnote 1 reads “Or the total hourly cost to the city of Walla Walla, whichever is greater. This cost shall include supervision, overhead, equipment, hourly wages and fringe benefits of the employees involved.” Quoting $65.00 per hour on its own would understate it. Outside consultants are billed at “Actual costs”, which footnote 2 says “include administrative and overhead costs.”

Roofing permit

Verified

Permit for reroofing and roof replacement in Walla Walla, priced through a roofing-specific valuation rule at WWMC 15.04.050(A)(2).

Verified 2026-09-16 · Source

Requirements

  • ROOFING GETS ITS OWN VALUATION RULE RATHER THAN ITS OWN FEE. WWMC 15.04.050(A)(2) applies to “Garage, single-family, duplex, and all other” roofing-only permits: “Fees shall be calculated in accordance with the schedule provided in subsection (A)(1) of this section; however, valuation shall be calculated as follows: Valuation is based upon number of squares (100 sq. ft.). If removal (tear-off) of existing roof is involved, the valuation amount is $200.00 per square or portion thereof. For roofing over an existing roof, the valuation amount is $100.00 per square or portion thereof.”
  • THE $200.00 AND $100.00 FIGURES ARE VALUATION INPUTS, NOT FEES. They are what the city deems the job to be worth per 100 square feet; the fee is then read off the tiered table in (A)(1). Treating either as the permit price would misstate the charge in both directions depending on roof size.
  • TEARING OFF DOUBLES THE DEEMED VALUATION against roofing over, so the same roof area can fall in different fee tiers depending on method. “Or portion thereof” means partial squares round up.
  • A THREE-TRIGGER EXPIRY, AND ANY ONE OF THEM VOIDS THE PERMIT. WWMC 15.04.005(G): “All permits shall expire by limitation and be declared void if: 1. Work is not started within one hundred eighty days of obtaining a permit, 2. Work is abandoned for one hundred eighty days or more after beginning work, or 3. After two years from the date of permit issuance, regardless of whether the work is finished.” The third is absolute — steady visible progress does not save a permit at two years. This matches the structure Puyallup and Wenatchee publish, and differs from SeaTac, which times a permit by what it builds rather than by whether work is happening.
  • AN APPROVED APPLICATION CAN STILL GO VOID BEFORE YOU HOLD A PERMIT. WWMC 15.04.005(G): “When an applicant has been notified that their permit application has been approved and is ready to purchase, the applicant shall obtain the permit within thirty days of notification or said permit application shall become void.”
  • THE ROLLING CLAUSE IS NOT IN THE ADOPTING SENTENCE — IT IS ITS OWN SECTION, AND A PHRASE-BASED AUDIT WOULD MISS IT. WWMC 15.04.030: “The amendment, addition or repeal of any section of any of the adopted codes, regulations, or statutes shall be deemed to amend this chapter and the codes, regulations, and statutes contained in this chapter are adopted by reference in conformity with the amendment, addition or repeal, and it shall not be necessary for the legislative authority of this city to take any action with respect to such addition, amendment or repeal as provided by RCW 35A.12.140.” MEASURED, NOT ASSUMED: a regular expression for the usual rolling formulations (“as now or hereafter amended”, “as the same exists”, “may hereafter be amended”, “as now in effect”) returns NOTHING across all 75,567 characters of Chapter 15.04. The years are named and the state layer still rolls; the two facts just live in different sections.

Required documents

  • RequiredBuilding permit applicationFiled under WWMC Chapter 15.04. Note two things that decide timing rather than approval: permits issue only to the property owner or their authorized agent (15.04.005(F)), and plan review fees at 65 percent of the permit fee plus any state surcharge are “due and payable upon filing of permit application” (15.04.050(A)(5)) — not at issuance.
  • RequiredProject valuation for fee calculationFees are computed from valuation under WWMC 15.04.050(A)(1), and the valuation basis is the ICC building valuation data table adopted at 15.04.005(H), which updates without the city amending its code. For roofing the valuation is defined by area instead: $200.00 per square where the existing roof is torn off, $100.00 per square for roofing over. Those per-square figures are VALUATION INPUTS, not the fee.

Fee schedule

Fee typeAmountNotes
Building permit fee (valuation-based)From $30.00, tiered by valuation
WWMC 15.04.050(A)(1) publishes the whole schedule in dollars. Show full citation

WWMC 15.04.050(A)(1) publishes the whole schedule in dollars. Eight valuation tiers: $0.01–$500.00 is a flat $30.00; then $30.00 plus $3.61 per additional $100 to $2,000; $84.78 plus $16.95 per $1,000 to $25,000; $475.48 plus $12.26 per $1,000 to $50,000; $782.23 plus $8.49 per $1,000 to $100,000; $1,207.69 plus $6.80 per $1,000 to $500,000; $3,929.93 plus $5.77 per $1,000 to $1,000,000; and $6,816.23 plus $4.62 per $1,000 above that. >>> CONTINUITY CONTROL, RUN THIS SESSION AND REPORTED AS MEASURED RATHER THAN AS AN ERROR: 6 of the 7 tier boundaries are discontinuous, and EVERY DIFFERENCE IS POSITIVE — the next tier's published base always sits slightly above what the tier below it computes to. At $2,000 the lower tier yields $84.15 against a published $84.78 (+$0.63); at $25,000, $474.63 against $475.48 (+$0.85); at $50,000, $781.98 against $782.23 (+$0.25); at $100,000, $1,206.73 against $1,207.69 (+$0.96); at $500,000, $3,927.69 against $3,929.93 (+$2.24); at $1,000,000, $6,814.93 against $6,816.23 (+$1.30). Only the $500 boundary is exact. The check was run with a known-continuous control table that correctly reported zero. A one-directional residual is not what arithmetic slips look like, but this entry does not diagnose the cause and the city's published figures govern.

Plan review and state surcharge65% of permit fee, plus surcharge
TWO CHARGES SIT ON TOP OF EVERY PERMIT FEE AND NEITHER IS IN THE TIER TABLE. Show full citation

TWO CHARGES SIT ON TOP OF EVERY PERMIT FEE AND NEITHER IS IN THE TIER TABLE. WWMC 15.04.050(A)(5): “plan review fees in the amount of sixty-five percent of the applicable permit fee, plus state surcharges which may apply, shall be due and payable upon filing of permit application.” 15.04.050(A)(6) names the surcharges: $6.50 for building permits, $2.00 “for each additional unit for a building containing more than one residential unit”, and $25.00 for commercial building permits. So the cash due at application is roughly 1.65x the table figure plus a surcharge. WALLA WALLA AND LONGVIEW USE THE SAME PERCENTAGE SHAPE AND ONLY ONE OF THEM IS COMPUTABLE: Longview publishes 65/70/30 percent over a master fee schedule it does not print, while Walla Walla publishes both the percentage AND the base table it applies to.

Hourly and reinspection charges$65.00/hour or actual cost, if higher
THE PUBLISHED HOURLY RATE IS A FLOOR, NOT A PRICE. Show full citation

THE PUBLISHED HOURLY RATE IS A FLOOR, NOT A PRICE. WWMC 15.04.050(A)(7) charges $65.00 per hour for inspections outside normal business hours (two-hour minimum), reinspections, inspections for which no fee is specified, and additional plan review caused by changes (half-hour minimum) — but footnote 1 reads “Or the total hourly cost to the city of Walla Walla, whichever is greater. This cost shall include supervision, overhead, equipment, hourly wages and fringe benefits of the employees involved.” Quoting $65.00 per hour on its own would understate it. Outside consultants are billed at “Actual costs”, which footnote 2 says “include administrative and overhead costs.”

Valuation basisICC building valuation data table
THE RATE TABLE IS PUBLISHED AND THE VALUATION FEEDING IT IS DELEGATED, WHICH IS THE EXACT INVERSE OF SEATAC. Show full citation

THE RATE TABLE IS PUBLISHED AND THE VALUATION FEEDING IT IS DELEGATED, WHICH IS THE EXACT INVERSE OF SEATAC. WWMC 15.04.005(H): “the city of Walla Walla adopts by reference the most recent building valuation data (BVD) table published by the International Code Council, as amended. Any changes in the BVD table published by the International Code Council shall be deemed to be adopted by the city of Walla Walla without additional amendment to this subsection.” SeaTac publishes the valuation method and withholds the rate; Walla Walla publishes the rate and delegates the valuation input. Both leave a reader one step short of a final number, from opposite directions.

Demolition permit

Verified

Permit to demolish a building or outbuilding in Walla Walla, priced as a flat fee at WWMC 15.04.050(A)(4).

Verified 2026-09-16 · Source

Requirements

  • WWMC 15.04.050(A)(4), quoted as published and entirely without dollar signs: “A fifty-seven-dollar permit fee shall apply for demolition of each residential or commercial building. A twenty-six-dollar permit fee shall apply for demolition of each outbuilding.”
  • THE FEE IS PER BUILDING, NOT PER SITE — “each residential or commercial building” and “each outbuilding”. A site with a house and two sheds is three fees.
  • Walla Walla also adopts the Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings at WWMC 15.04.015. That section was not opened for this entry and nothing here rests on it, but it is the obvious place to look if the demolition is ordered rather than elective.
  • A separate chapter, WWMC 15.36 HOUSE AND STRUCTURE RELOCATION, governs moving a structure rather than demolishing it. It was not opened for this entry.
  • A THREE-TRIGGER EXPIRY, AND ANY ONE OF THEM VOIDS THE PERMIT. WWMC 15.04.005(G): “All permits shall expire by limitation and be declared void if: 1. Work is not started within one hundred eighty days of obtaining a permit, 2. Work is abandoned for one hundred eighty days or more after beginning work, or 3. After two years from the date of permit issuance, regardless of whether the work is finished.” The third is absolute — steady visible progress does not save a permit at two years. This matches the structure Puyallup and Wenatchee publish, and differs from SeaTac, which times a permit by what it builds rather than by whether work is happening.
  • AN APPROVED APPLICATION CAN STILL GO VOID BEFORE YOU HOLD A PERMIT. WWMC 15.04.005(G): “When an applicant has been notified that their permit application has been approved and is ready to purchase, the applicant shall obtain the permit within thirty days of notification or said permit application shall become void.”

Required documents

  • RequiredBuilding permit applicationFiled under WWMC Chapter 15.04. Note two things that decide timing rather than approval: permits issue only to the property owner or their authorized agent (15.04.005(F)), and plan review fees at 65 percent of the permit fee plus any state surcharge are “due and payable upon filing of permit application” (15.04.050(A)(5)) — not at issuance.

Fee schedule

Fee typeAmountNotes
Demolition permit (per building)$57.00 building; $26.00 outbuilding
WWMC 15.04.050(A)(4). THE CODE PRINTS THESE IN WORDS, NOT DIGITS — “A fifty-seven-dollar permit fee” and “A twenty-six-dollar permit fee” — so a scan for a dollar sign finds no price here at all. Show full citation

WWMC 15.04.050(A)(4). THE CODE PRINTS THESE IN WORDS, NOT DIGITS — “A fifty-seven-dollar permit fee” and “A twenty-six-dollar permit fee” — so a scan for a dollar sign finds no price here at all. The figures above are those words rendered in digits, which is a transcription and not a change of meaning. The fee is charged per building. Plan review at 65 percent of the permit fee and any state surcharge may also apply under 15.04.050(A)(5) and (6).

Plan review and state surcharge65% of permit fee, plus surcharge
TWO CHARGES SIT ON TOP OF EVERY PERMIT FEE AND NEITHER IS IN THE TIER TABLE. Show full citation

TWO CHARGES SIT ON TOP OF EVERY PERMIT FEE AND NEITHER IS IN THE TIER TABLE. WWMC 15.04.050(A)(5): “plan review fees in the amount of sixty-five percent of the applicable permit fee, plus state surcharges which may apply, shall be due and payable upon filing of permit application.” 15.04.050(A)(6) names the surcharges: $6.50 for building permits, $2.00 “for each additional unit for a building containing more than one residential unit”, and $25.00 for commercial building permits. So the cash due at application is roughly 1.65x the table figure plus a surcharge. WALLA WALLA AND LONGVIEW USE THE SAME PERCENTAGE SHAPE AND ONLY ONE OF THEM IS COMPUTABLE: Longview publishes 65/70/30 percent over a master fee schedule it does not print, while Walla Walla publishes both the percentage AND the base table it applies to.

Sources & verification

Verified against official sources. Last reviewed 2026-09-16.

Fees, timelines, and adopted codes are researched from each jurisdiction's published records — see how we verify. Requirements change and vary by project, so always confirm the current details with the Walla Walla building department before you submit. PermitBase is an independent reference and is not affiliated with any government agency.

View current record →All versions →

Permalink: /washington/walla-walla-county/walla-walla/as-of/2026-09-16/

Snapshot date: 2026-09-16

Commit: 0f10392

Reproducible from PermitBase’s version-controlled dataset, commit 0f10392.