Skip to main content
PermitBase

Electrical permit in Moses Lake, Washington

Electrical work in Moses Lake is inspected by the Washington State Department of Labor and Industries, not by the city, under MLMC Chapter 16.65.

Verified 2026-09-16 · Source

When you need this permit

  • >>> MOSES LAKE IS THE FIRST CITY IN THIS SET TO PUBLISH WHO INSPECTS ELECTRICAL WORK, AND THE ANSWER IS NOT THE CITY. MLMC 16.65.010: “This chapter is enacted to establish the requirement for electrical inspections, performed by the Department of Labor and Industries, for all work that requires an electrical permit.” Every other Washington entry in this project leaves that question open; this one answers it in its own code. >>> AND THE STATE'S INSPECTION GATES THE CITY'S OWN MILESTONES, WHICH IS THE PART THAT STALLS PROJECTS. MLMC 16.65.030: “The applicant shall coordinate with the DL&I for the rough in electrical inspection. The city will not complete the framing inspection until the DL&I has approved the rough in electrical inspection. The DL&I approval will be evidenced by their signature on their job card.” And 16.65.040: the city “will not issue a certificate of occupancy until” the DL&I final electrical inspection is complete. TWO AGENCIES, ONE SEQUENCE, AND THE COORDINATION IS THE APPLICANT'S JOB.
  • MLMC Chapter 16.65 has four sections: 16.65.010 Statement of Policy, 16.65.020 Definitions, 16.65.030 Rough Electrical Inspection Required and 16.65.040 Final Electrical Inspection Required. The definitions name DL&I and define the rough-in inspection as approving “the electrical work up to and including all junction boxes”.
  • NO ELECTRICAL CODE IS ADOPTED IN TITLE 16. The chapter establishes an INSPECTION requirement and names the inspecting agency; it does not adopt the National Electrical Code or any other electrical standard, and no other chapter in Title 16 does either.
  • >>> MOSES LAKE ADOPTS NO MODEL CODE AND NO WAC CHAPTER. IT ADOPTS APPENDICES. MLMC 16.02.020 opens: “Pursuant to Chapters 19.27 and 35.21 RCW the state building code is established. Effective July 1, 2004, the following appendixes to the state building code are adopted for use within the city”. The base code is not adopted by the city at all — it arrives by operation of state statute, and the ordinance only picks up the appendices the state leaves optional. SO THERE IS NO EDITION YEAR AND NO EDITION PHRASE IN THE BASE ADOPTION, BECAUSE THERE IS NO BASE ADOPTION. Des Moines adopts the WAC chapters themselves, which is already a step removed from naming a model code; Moses Lake does not even do that. The audit rule keys on the absence of a year, and here there is not even a sentence for a year to be absent from. A YEAR-CONTEXT TRAP SITS IN THE SAME SENTENCE: “Effective July 1, 2004” is the date the appendix adoptions took effect, not an edition. THE SUPPLEMENTARY CODES DO CARRY AN EDITION PHRASE, AND IT IS ONE ALREADY SEEN: MLMC 16.02.020(D) adopts the Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings, the Uniform Housing Code and the International Swimming Pool and Spa Code, each at “most current edition” — the same wording SeaTac and Pullman use, now a third and fourth city on that phrase.

Required documents

Check off what you have — your progress is saved on this device.

Not ready yet0 of 1 required documents checked.

This checker covers one permit. A full project usually triggers several — our checklist will assemble all of them, free →

Fee schedule

Permit fee
MLMC 16.02.085: “All fees for permits issued pursuant to this chapter shall be established by a resolution of the City Council.” No dollar amount appears in the chapter and the resolution is a separate document. Show full citationMLMC 16.02.085: “All fees for permits issued pursuant to this chapter shall be established by a resolution of the City Council.” No dollar amount appears in the chapter and the resolution is a separate document. >>> THE FIRST FEE EXEMPTION IN THIS WASHINGTON SET, AND IT IS WORTH KNOWING ABOUT. 16.02.085(A): the fees “shall not apply to single-family dwellings or duplex dwellings when all the following conditions are present: 1. The residential structure is constructed for low income families as defined by the Community Development Director. 2. The structure is being constructed by an organization classified as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization by the United States Internal Revenue Service.” Both conditions, not either. PLAN REVIEW IS A PUBLISHED PERCENTAGE OVER AN UNPUBLISHED BASE: 16.02.085(B) requires it “at the time of submitting the submittal documents” and sets it at “sixty-five percent (65%) of the permit fees as established” — the same 65% Walla Walla publishes, but Walla Walla prints the base table and Moses Lake does not.
Set by city council resolution
Investigation fee (work without a permit)
MLMC 16.02.087 doubles the cost of starting early and says plainly why. Show full citationMLMC 16.02.087 doubles the cost of starting early and says plainly why. An investigation fee “shall be collected whether or not a permit is then or subsequently issued” and “shall be equal to the amount of the permit fee required by this code”, with a minimum matching the fee resolution's minimum. THE CODE CALLS IT WHAT IT IS: “This fee is an additional, punitive fee”. No other city in this Washington set uses that word; SeaTac and Walla Walla impose the same doubling and describe it neutrally.
Equal to the permit fee; punitive
Refund of a paid fee
MLMC 16.02.085(C) publishes a refund rule: any fee “erroneously paid or collected”, then “not more than eighty percent (80%) of the permit fee paid when no work has been done under a permit”, and not… Show full citationMLMC 16.02.085(C) publishes a refund rule: any fee “erroneously paid or collected”, then “not more than eighty percent (80%) of the permit fee paid when no work has been done under a permit”, and not more than eighty percent of the plan review fee in the parallel case. Note “not more than” — 80% is a ceiling on the Building Official's discretion, not an entitlement, which is a weaker guarantee than Tumwater's flat 80%.
Up to 80% if no work has been done

Review timeline

Plan review
Not published — contact the department

How long did your Electrical permit permit actually take in Moses Lake?

Anonymous — one question, no email. Answers are combined and only shown once at least 5 people have reported.

Inspection process

    Tips

    • THE CITY DOES NOT INSPECT YOUR ELECTRICAL WORK AND WILL NOT PROCEED WITHOUT THE STATE'S SIGN-OFF. MLMC 16.65.030: the framing inspection waits on DL&I's rough-in approval, evidenced by a signature on the DL&I job card. Book the state inspection before you book the city's framing inspection.
    • NO CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY UNTIL THE DL&I FINAL IS DONE (MLMC 16.65.040). The applicant coordinates with DL&I — that scheduling is not the city's job and is a common source of delay.
    • Moses Lake is the only city in this Washington set whose code states who inspects electrical work. Elsewhere the question is left open, so do not carry this answer to a neighbouring city.

    Frequently asked questions

    Moses Lake requires an electrical permit for: >>> MOSES LAKE IS THE FIRST CITY IN THIS SET TO PUBLISH WHO INSPECTS ELECTRICAL WORK, AND THE ANSWER IS NOT THE CITY. MLMC 16.65.010: “This chapter is enacted to establish the requirement for electrical inspections, performed by the Department of Labor and Industries, for all work that requires an electrical permit.” Every other Washington entry in this project leaves that question open; this one answers it in its own code. >>> AND THE STATE'S INSPECTION GATES THE CITY'S OWN MILESTONES, WHICH IS THE PART THAT STALLS PROJECTS. MLMC 16.65.030: “The applicant shall coordinate with the DL&I for the rough in electrical inspection. The city will not complete the framing inspection until the DL&I has approved the rough in electrical inspection. The DL&I approval will be evidenced by their signature on their job card.” And 16.65.040: the city “will not issue a certificate of occupancy until” the DL&I final electrical inspection is complete. TWO AGENCIES, ONE SEQUENCE, AND THE COORDINATION IS THE APPLICANT'S JOB.; MLMC Chapter 16.65 has four sections: 16.65.010 Statement of Policy, 16.65.020 Definitions, 16.65.030 Rough Electrical Inspection Required and 16.65.040 Final Electrical Inspection Required. The definitions name DL&I and define the rough-in inspection as approving “the electrical work up to and including all junction boxes”.; NO ELECTRICAL CODE IS ADOPTED IN TITLE 16. The chapter establishes an INSPECTION requirement and names the inspecting agency; it does not adopt the National Electrical Code or any other electrical standard, and no other chapter in Title 16 does either.; >>> MOSES LAKE ADOPTS NO MODEL CODE AND NO WAC CHAPTER. IT ADOPTS APPENDICES. MLMC 16.02.020 opens: “Pursuant to Chapters 19.27 and 35.21 RCW the state building code is established. Effective July 1, 2004, the following appendixes to the state building code are adopted for use within the city”. The base code is not adopted by the city at all — it arrives by operation of state statute, and the ordinance only picks up the appendices the state leaves optional. SO THERE IS NO EDITION YEAR AND NO EDITION PHRASE IN THE BASE ADOPTION, BECAUSE THERE IS NO BASE ADOPTION. Des Moines adopts the WAC chapters themselves, which is already a step removed from naming a model code; Moses Lake does not even do that. The audit rule keys on the absence of a year, and here there is not even a sentence for a year to be absent from. A YEAR-CONTEXT TRAP SITS IN THE SAME SENTENCE: “Effective July 1, 2004” is the date the appendix adoptions took effect, not an edition. THE SUPPLEMENTARY CODES DO CARRY AN EDITION PHRASE, AND IT IS ONE ALREADY SEEN: MLMC 16.02.020(D) adopts the Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings, the Uniform Housing Code and the International Swimming Pool and Spa Code, each at “most current edition” — the same wording SeaTac and Pullman use, now a third and fourth city on that phrase.. If your project isn't listed, confirm with City of Moses Lake at (509) 764-3701 before starting work.

    In Moses Lake, the published Permit fee is: Set by city council resolution. Additional published fees: Investigation fee (work without a permit) — Equal to the permit fee; punitive; Refund of a paid fee — Up to 80% if no work has been done. These are the jurisdiction's own published figures — see the fee schedule table and source citations on this page.

    Moses Lake does not publish a plan-review timeline for this permit. Contact City of Moses Lake at (509) 764-3701 for current turnaround.

    You'll need: Department of Labor and Industries electrical job card. See the required-documents checklist on this page for details on each.

    Apply through City of Moses Lake at 401 S Balsam, Moses Lake, WA 98837. Phone: (509) 764-3701. Official information: https://www.cityofml.com/.

    Moses Lake, Washington has adopted: MLMC 16.02.020: “Pursuant to Chapters 19.27 and 35.21 RCW the state building code is established. Effective July 1, 2004, the following appendixes to the state building code are adopted for use within the city:”; IBC appendices — Appendix C (Agricultural Buildings), Appendix I (Patio Covers) and Appendix J (Grading), the last only where grading exceeds 500 cubic yards, or the work is regulated by Chapter 19.03 or 19.06, or by the City of Moses Lake Shorelines Management Master Plan.; IRC appendices — Appendix AH (Patio Covers) and Appendix AQ (Tiny Houses).; State Plumbing Code — “Chapter 7 Part II, Building Sewers, is hereby adopted” and “Appendix E, Manufactured/Mobile Home Parks and Recreational Vehicle Parks, is hereby adopted.”; MLMC 16.02.020(D), each at “most current edition”: the Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings; the Uniform Housing Code “published by the International Conference of Building Officials”; and the International Swimming Pool and Spa Code. These “are to be administered subject to the modifications and/or amendments set forth in Sections 16.02.050 and 16.02.060.”; NO ELECTRICAL CODE AND NO MECHANICAL CODE IS ADOPTED ANYWHERE IN TITLE 16. MLMC Chapter 16.65 establishes an electrical INSPECTION requirement performed by the Department of Labor and Industries rather than adopting an electrical standard.; NOT OPENED: MLMC 16.08 Dangerous Buildings, 16.16 Moving Buildings, 16.32 Radio Antenna, 16.36 Fire Code, 16.40 Fire Department Permit Fees, 16.48 Fire Hydrants, 16.50 Fire Flow, 16.52 Automatic Fire Extinguishing and Fire Alarm Systems and 16.71 Interceptors.. Local amendments apply — see the Moses Lake overview page for the full list.

    The Washington State Department of Labor and Industries. MLMC 16.65.010 enacts the chapter “to establish the requirement for electrical inspections, performed by the Department of Labor and Industries, for all work that requires an electrical permit.” The applicant coordinates with DL&I, and two city milestones depend on it: the framing inspection waits on DL&I's rough-in approval, and the certificate of occupancy waits on the DL&I final.

    Sources & verification

    Verified against official sources. Last reviewed 2026-09-16.

    Fees, timelines, and adopted codes are researched from each jurisdiction's published records — see how we verify. Requirements change and vary by project, so always confirm the current details with the Moses Lake building department before you submit. PermitBase is an independent reference and is not affiliated with any government agency.

    Moses Lake's permit history isn't searchable here yet

    This page covers what the permit requires. What we don't have for Moses Lake yet is the record of permits actually issued — the history you'd search by street address. That is a gap in our coverage, not a statement about any particular property.

    Your email, and the place — never an address. We only use it to tell you when Moses Lake lands. Privacy.