Mechanical permit — Pullman, Washington · Requirements sheet
Verified 2026-09-16 · Source: https://pullman.municipal.codes/Code/2.25
PermitBase is an independent reference and is not affiliated with any government agency. Requirements change and vary by project — confirm current details with the building department before you submit.
Mechanical permit in Pullman, Washington
Permit for heating, ventilation, air conditioning and fuel-gas work in Pullman under the International Mechanical Code as adopted at PCC 2.25.010.
Verified 2026-09-16 · Source
When you need this permit
- PCC 2.25.010(1) adopts “the most current edition of the International Mechanical Code (referred to in this Chapter as the IMC) as adopted by the State of Washington and its additions, deletions, and exceptions noted in Chapter 51-52 WAC as now existing and in accordance with any amendments that may hereafter be made thereto”, and (2) adds “the most current edition of the International Fuel Gas Code (referred to in this Chapter as the IFGC) as adopted by the State of Washington” under the same WAC chapter and the same rolling terms.
- NO NFPA STANDARD IS NAMED IN THIS CHAPTER AT ALL, and that is measured rather than assumed: a search for “NFPA” across the whole of Chapter 2.25 returns nothing. Several other cities in this Washington set name NFPA 58 with an explicit edition year; Pullman does not name it, so no year for it is asserted here either way.
- PCC 2.25.030 covers gas piping and fitting and was not opened for this entry.
- FOUR SECTIONS OF THIS CHAPTER ARE PUBLISHED AS BARE “Repealed.” — PCC 2.25.040, .050, .060 and .070 — with no subject name and no repealing ordinance shown in the section list. What they once contained cannot be read off the code.
- BUDGET ROUGHLY DOUBLE THE PERMIT FEE AT THE COUNTER, AND HALF OF IT IS REFUNDABLE. PCC 2.15.070 amends IBC and IRC Section 105 to add: “To the cost of every permit authorized under Section 105 of the IBC and IRC, except a permit issued for purposes that require no earthmoving or transportation of earth or other debris, shall be added a cash deposit equal to the cost of the building permit as provided for in Section 2.15.020.” THIS IS A DEPOSIT, NOT A FEE — it secures removal of “any earth, fresh concrete, rock rubble or debris which is deposited on any portion of public right-of-way … by the permittee”, to be cleared “at the end of the work day” or as the Public Works Director directs. If the right-of-way is damaged or not restored, the Director may order restoration “as often as may be necessary”. The exemption is narrow: only permits requiring NO earthmoving or earth transport escape it. NOTE THAT IT CARRIES NO DOLLAR FIGURE AT ALL — it is defined as a multiple of a fee that is itself set by resolution.
- PULLMAN PUBLISHES A CONFLICT ORDER AND IT IS NOT THE SAME ORDER AS ITS NEIGHBOURS'. PCC 2.10.050: “In case of a conflict between the provisions of the various codes regulating construction as listed in Section 2.10.010, the first listed code as listed in Section 2.10.010 of this Chapter shall govern unless specifically provided otherwise in Chapter 19.27 RCW, WAC 51-50 or elsewhere in this Title.” The list at 2.10.010 runs: the Washington State Building Code, then the Building Code (2.15), the Plumbing Code (2.20), the Mechanical Code (2.25), the Fire Code (3.16), the Energy Code (2.30) and the Electrical Code (2.35). >>> THE MECHANISM IS SHARED ACROSS CITIES AND THE ORDERING IS NOT. Walla Walla publishes the same first-listed-governs rule with plumbing LAST, behind the IBC, IRC, IMC and IFC; Pullman puts plumbing SECOND, ahead of mechanical, fire, energy and electrical. Wenatchee publishes the same idea again in different words. A reader who learned the rule in one of these cities would get the opposite answer about plumbing in the other.
- THE DELEGATION IS STATED TWICE, IN TWO PLACES, WHICH IS THE OPPOSITE OF THE TRAP THE PREVIOUS CITY SET. Each chapter's own adopting sentence carries both the delegation and the roll — “the most current edition … as adopted by the State of Washington … as now existing and in accordance with any amendments that may hereafter be made thereto” — AND the definition of the Construction Code at PCC 2.10.010 repeats the roll for the Washington State Building Code as a whole. Walla Walla put its roll in a section by itself with no rolling phrase in any adopting sentence; Pullman says it in both places.
- Appeals run to the Hearing Examiner under PCC 2.10.090 through 2.10.130, with separate sections for appeal procedures, the Examiner's determination, failure to obey a final order and appeal of the Examiner's own action. This guide does not summarise those sections, so no deadline or filing requirement is stated here.
Required documents
Check off what you have — your progress is saved on this device.
Not ready yet — 0 of 2 required documents checked.
This checker covers one permit. A full project usually triggers several — our checklist will assemble all of them, free →
Fee schedule
PCC 2.15.020: “Fees shall be charged for building permits and any appeals to the Building Code defined in 2.15.010. Show full citationHide
PCC 2.15.020: “Fees shall be charged for building permits and any appeals to the Building Code defined in 2.15.010. The types and amounts of such fees shall be set by resolution of the City Council except where such fees are specifically set forth in this Chapter, and such fees shall supersede any fee schedule contained in the International Building Code and International Residential Code.” NO DOLLAR AMOUNT APPEARS IN THE CODE and the resolution was not opened for this entry. TWO PARTS OF THAT SENTENCE ARE EASY TO SKIM PAST. First, the carve-out — “except where such fees are specifically set forth in this Chapter” — means the resolution is not the only source, so a reader who finds the resolution has not necessarily found everything. Second, the city's fees expressly SUPERSEDE the fee schedules printed in the IBC and IRC, so the model-code tables are not a fallback and should not be read as one. Refunds where no work has been done are also set by resolution.Review timeline
Inspection process
Tips
- PULLMAN NAMES NO NFPA EDITION FOR PROPANE WORK because it names no editions at all — the IMC and IFGC are both taken at “the most current edition … as adopted by the State of Washington”. Cities that DO name NFPA 58 disagree with each other about the year, so confirm the operative standard with the Building Official rather than carrying a year across city lines.
- FOUR REPEALED SECTIONS IN THIS CHAPTER SHOW ONLY THE WORD “Repealed.”, without the subject they used to cover. If you are checking whether an old mechanical requirement survived, the section list will not tell you what was removed.
Frequently asked questions
Sources & verification
Verified against official sources. Last reviewed 2026-09-16.
Codes & ordinances
Fees, timelines, and adopted codes are researched from each jurisdiction's published records — see how we verify. Requirements change and vary by project, so always confirm the current details with the Pullman building department before you submit. PermitBase is an independent reference and is not affiliated with any government agency.
Pullman's permit history isn't searchable here yet
This page covers what the permit requires. What we don't have for Pullman yet is the record of permits actually issued — the history you'd search by street address. That is a gap in our coverage, not a statement about any particular property.
Your email, and the place — never an address. We only use it to tell you when Pullman lands. Privacy.
Other permits in Pullman
Mechanical permit in other cities
Compare mechanical permit fees across Washington →
Look up this fee in a different city →
Now live
Build your Pullman project checklist
Describe your project once and get every permit, document, and fee it triggers in Pullman — in one checklist. Free, for any city and any number of projects.
Get started →