Skip to main content
PermitBase

Commercial building permit in Tumwater, Washington

Permit for commercial, industrial and institutional construction in Tumwater under the International Building Code adopted at TMC 15.04.010.

Verified 2026-09-16 · Source

When you need this permit

  • TMC 15.04.010 adopts “the International Building Code, 2021 Edition, as amended by Chapter 51-50 WAC, which includes adoption of and amendments to the International Existing Building Code, 2021 Edition, and ICC/ANSI A117.1-2017, including Appendix Chapters E, Supplementary accessibility requirements; G, Flood resistant construction; H, Signs; I, Patio Covers; and J, Grading”. FIVE APPENDICES, and the accessibility standard is pinned to a dated version, A117.1-2017.
  • The city also adopts the International Fire Code (TMC 15.16), International Property Maintenance Code (15.18) and International Energy Conservation Code (15.20), each in its own chapter. Those three chapters were NOT opened and no edition year is asserted for any of them.
  • THE BUILDING CODE CHAPTER POINTS AT THE OTHER CHAPTERS FOR WHOLE SUBJECTS: TMC 15.04.015(B) amends IBC 101.4.3 so plumbing is governed by the UPC as adopted in Chapter 15.12, and (C) amends 101.4.6 so energy is governed by the IECC as adopted in Chapter 15.20.
  • TUMWATER STRIPS THE MODEL CODES' OWN ADMINISTRATION AND SUBSTITUTES ITS OWN, WHICH IS WHY CHAPTER 15.01 MATTERS MORE HERE THAN THE CODE CHAPTERS DO. Not adopted: IBC Sections 105.3.2, 105.5, 109.2, 109.6, 113 and Appendix H Sections H108, H109, H110 and H112; IRC Sections R105.3.2, R105.5, R108.2, R108.5, R108.6, R112 and Appendix T103.2 through T103.5; IMC Sections 106.3.3, 106.4.3, 106.4.4, 106.5, 106.5.1, 106.5.2 and 109; UPC Sections 104.3.2, 104.3.3, 104.4.3, 104.4.4, 104.5 and 107.0. Those are the permit-expiry, fee, refund and board-of-appeals provisions in each code. Everything that governs them in Tumwater is in TMC Chapter 15.01.
  • >>> TUMWATER HAS AFFIRMATIVELY OPTED OUT OF THE STATE'S PERMIT-PROCESSING CLOCKS, AND SAYS SO IN ONE SENTENCE. TMC 15.01.045, added by Ord. O2024-005 on 03/12/2024: “As authorized by RCW 36.70B.140, permits issued under this title are exempt from the timeline provisions of RCW 36.70B.060 through 36.70B.090 and 36.70B.110 through 36.70B.130.” THIS IS A PUBLISHED REASON RATHER THAN AN ABSENCE. Most cities in this Washington set simply do not state a review period, and the honest note is “not found where it would be expected”. Here the code tells you the statutory timelines have been disapplied. WHAT EXACTLY IS DISAPPLIED IS NOT ASSERTED — those RCW sections were NOT read for this entry — but the exemption itself is quoted from the code.
  • THE THIRD EXPIRY TRIGGER IS OBJECTIVE WHERE MOST CITIES' IS A JUDGEMENT CALL. TMC 15.01.060(A): a permit is void “if the building or work authorized by such permit is not commenced within one hundred eighty days from the date of such permit, or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned at any time or if no required inspections have been approved after the work is commenced for a period of one hundred eighty days.” MOST CITIES IN THIS SET TIME ABANDONMENT; TUMWATER ALSO TIMES APPROVED INSPECTIONS. A job that is genuinely progressing but has not passed an inspection in six months is on the same clock as one that stopped, which is a much easier condition to trip without noticing and a much easier one to check.
  • RESTARTING IS HALF PRICE, BUT ONLY INSIDE A ONE-YEAR WINDOW AND ONLY IF NOTHING CHANGED. TMC 15.01.060(A)(1): a new permit costs “one-half the amount required for a new permit for such work, provided no changes have been made or will be made in the original plans and specifications for such work; and provided further, that such suspension or abandonment has not exceeded one year.” And (A)(2): permits “not renewed … and have not been active for one year from date of last action shall be deemed expired and new applications and permits will be required.”
  • TWO EXTENSIONS, NO MORE, AND ONLY FOR CIRCUMSTANCES OUTSIDE YOUR CONTROL. TMC 15.01.060(B): the building official “may extend the time for action by the permittee for a period not exceeding one hundred eighty days on written request by the permittee showing that circumstances beyond the control of the permittee have prevented action from being taken”, and “No permit shall be extended more than twice.” The extension itself carries a fee under the council's schedule. Compare SeaTac (one extension) and Des Moines (“one or more”, no published limit).
  • THE APPLICATION HAS TWO SEPARATE CLOCKS. TMC 15.01.050(A): applications “for which no permit is issued within one hundred eighty days following the date of the application shall expire by limitation unless extended”, and (B) plans and other data for expired applications “may thereafter be returned to the applicant or destroyed by the building official in accordance with state law”. Separately, under (C), applications in review “shall be canceled for inactivity if an applicant fails to substantially respond within ninety days” to the building official's review comments.
  • TUMWATER NAMES 2021 THROUGHOUT AND PUTS NO ROLLING CLAUSE ON THE CODES — BUT IT DOES USE ROLLING LANGUAGE ELSEWHERE IN THE SAME TITLE, WHICH IS THE INFORMATIVE PART. Measured: a rolling-phrase search over Chapter 15.04 returns ZERO across all 7,888 characters, while the same pattern fires three times in Chapter 15.01 — so the instrument was demonstrably alive when it reported zero. ALL THREE HITS IN 15.01 ATTACH TO THE FEE SCHEDULE, NOT TO THE CODES: fees are “as currently adopted or as may be amended from time to time by resolution” (one hit is a false positive, “may thereafter be returned”). So within one title the drafter used a rolling formula for the money and withheld it from the codes. >>> TWO READINGS ARE RECORDED AND NEITHER IS ADJUDICATED. On its face this is named-and-static. But each adoption also reads “as amended by Chapter 51-xx WAC”, and that reference can be read as carrying a state chapter that does move. The contrast with the fee schedule is evidence a reader can weigh; it is not proof of intent and is not treated as such here. Maple Valley presents the same combination without the internal contrast.
  • A DEDICATED VESTING CHAPTER EXISTS AT TMC 15.44 “VESTING OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS”, alongside 15.48 Transportation Concurrency Requirements. Neither was opened for this entry and nothing here rests on them, but both bear directly on what rules a project is measured against and when.
  • TMC 15.01.100 is headed “Building code appeals – Hearing examiner”. This guide does not summarise it, so no deadline or procedure is stated here. Note that the model codes' own appeal sections — IBC 113 and IRC R112 — are expressly NOT adopted, so this section is the route.

Required documents

Check off what you have — your progress is saved on this device.

Not ready yet0 of 2 required documents checked.

This checker covers one permit. A full project usually triggers several — our checklist will assemble all of them, free →

Fee schedule

Permit fee
TMC 15.01.070: “All fees for permits or other approvals required in this title shall be as currently adopted or as may be amended from time to time by resolution of the Tumwater city council. Show full citationTMC 15.01.070: “All fees for permits or other approvals required in this title shall be as currently adopted or as may be amended from time to time by resolution of the Tumwater city council. Copies of all fee schedules and any subsequent amendments thereto shall be maintained and available for public review at the office of the city clerk during regular business hours or on the city website”. NO DOLLAR AMOUNT APPEARS IN TITLE 15 and the resolution was not opened for this entry. NOTE THE STRUCTURAL REASON THE CODE HAS TO SAY THIS: Tumwater expressly DOES NOT ADOPT the model codes' own fee sections — IBC 109.2 and 109.6, IRC R108.2/.5/.6, IMC 109 and UPC 107.0 are all excluded — so the council resolution is not a supplement to the model schedules, it REPLACES them, and the model tables are not a fallback.
Set by city council resolution
Refund of a paid fee
TMC 15.01.080 publishes a refund rule, which is uncommon in this set: the building official may refund “One hundred percent of any fee erroneously paid or collected”, “Eighty percent of the permit… Show full citationTMC 15.01.080 publishes a refund rule, which is uncommon in this set: the building official may refund “One hundred percent of any fee erroneously paid or collected”, “Eighty percent of the permit fee paid when no work has been done under a permit issued in accordance with this code; and further provided, that the permit has not expired”, and eighty percent of the plan review fee in the parallel case. THE EXPIRY PROVISO IS THE TRAP — letting a permit lapse forfeits the refund as well as the permit.
100% if erroneous; 80% if no work done

Review timeline

Plan review
Not published — contact the department

How long did your Commercial building permit permit actually take in Tumwater?

Anonymous — one question, no email. Answers are combined and only shown once at least 5 people have reported.

Inspection process

    Tips

    • THE MODEL CODE'S FEE AND APPEAL SECTIONS ARE NOT ADOPTED HERE. IBC 109.2, 109.6 and 113 are expressly excluded, so do not price a job off the IBC's own fee table and do not look to a board of appeals — fees come from the council resolution and appeals go to the hearing examiner under TMC 15.01.100.
    • APPENDIX H (SIGNS) IS ADOPTED BUT FOUR OF ITS SECTIONS ARE NOT — H108, H109, H110 and H112. Read the adopting sentence before relying on any part of that appendix.
    • ACCESSIBILITY IS PINNED TO A DATED STANDARD, ICC/ANSI A117.1-2017, named in the adopting sentence rather than left to roll.

    Frequently asked questions

    Tumwater requires a commercial building permit for: TMC 15.04.010 adopts “the International Building Code, 2021 Edition, as amended by Chapter 51-50 WAC, which includes adoption of and amendments to the International Existing Building Code, 2021 Edition, and ICC/ANSI A117.1-2017, including Appendix Chapters E, Supplementary accessibility requirements; G, Flood resistant construction; H, Signs; I, Patio Covers; and J, Grading”. FIVE APPENDICES, and the accessibility standard is pinned to a dated version, A117.1-2017.; The city also adopts the International Fire Code (TMC 15.16), International Property Maintenance Code (15.18) and International Energy Conservation Code (15.20), each in its own chapter. Those three chapters were NOT opened and no edition year is asserted for any of them.; THE BUILDING CODE CHAPTER POINTS AT THE OTHER CHAPTERS FOR WHOLE SUBJECTS: TMC 15.04.015(B) amends IBC 101.4.3 so plumbing is governed by the UPC as adopted in Chapter 15.12, and (C) amends 101.4.6 so energy is governed by the IECC as adopted in Chapter 15.20.; TUMWATER STRIPS THE MODEL CODES' OWN ADMINISTRATION AND SUBSTITUTES ITS OWN, WHICH IS WHY CHAPTER 15.01 MATTERS MORE HERE THAN THE CODE CHAPTERS DO. Not adopted: IBC Sections 105.3.2, 105.5, 109.2, 109.6, 113 and Appendix H Sections H108, H109, H110 and H112; IRC Sections R105.3.2, R105.5, R108.2, R108.5, R108.6, R112 and Appendix T103.2 through T103.5; IMC Sections 106.3.3, 106.4.3, 106.4.4, 106.5, 106.5.1, 106.5.2 and 109; UPC Sections 104.3.2, 104.3.3, 104.4.3, 104.4.4, 104.5 and 107.0. Those are the permit-expiry, fee, refund and board-of-appeals provisions in each code. Everything that governs them in Tumwater is in TMC Chapter 15.01.; >>> TUMWATER HAS AFFIRMATIVELY OPTED OUT OF THE STATE'S PERMIT-PROCESSING CLOCKS, AND SAYS SO IN ONE SENTENCE. TMC 15.01.045, added by Ord. O2024-005 on 03/12/2024: “As authorized by RCW 36.70B.140, permits issued under this title are exempt from the timeline provisions of RCW 36.70B.060 through 36.70B.090 and 36.70B.110 through 36.70B.130.” THIS IS A PUBLISHED REASON RATHER THAN AN ABSENCE. Most cities in this Washington set simply do not state a review period, and the honest note is “not found where it would be expected”. Here the code tells you the statutory timelines have been disapplied. WHAT EXACTLY IS DISAPPLIED IS NOT ASSERTED — those RCW sections were NOT read for this entry — but the exemption itself is quoted from the code.; THE THIRD EXPIRY TRIGGER IS OBJECTIVE WHERE MOST CITIES' IS A JUDGEMENT CALL. TMC 15.01.060(A): a permit is void “if the building or work authorized by such permit is not commenced within one hundred eighty days from the date of such permit, or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned at any time or if no required inspections have been approved after the work is commenced for a period of one hundred eighty days.” MOST CITIES IN THIS SET TIME ABANDONMENT; TUMWATER ALSO TIMES APPROVED INSPECTIONS. A job that is genuinely progressing but has not passed an inspection in six months is on the same clock as one that stopped, which is a much easier condition to trip without noticing and a much easier one to check.; RESTARTING IS HALF PRICE, BUT ONLY INSIDE A ONE-YEAR WINDOW AND ONLY IF NOTHING CHANGED. TMC 15.01.060(A)(1): a new permit costs “one-half the amount required for a new permit for such work, provided no changes have been made or will be made in the original plans and specifications for such work; and provided further, that such suspension or abandonment has not exceeded one year.” And (A)(2): permits “not renewed … and have not been active for one year from date of last action shall be deemed expired and new applications and permits will be required.”; TWO EXTENSIONS, NO MORE, AND ONLY FOR CIRCUMSTANCES OUTSIDE YOUR CONTROL. TMC 15.01.060(B): the building official “may extend the time for action by the permittee for a period not exceeding one hundred eighty days on written request by the permittee showing that circumstances beyond the control of the permittee have prevented action from being taken”, and “No permit shall be extended more than twice.” The extension itself carries a fee under the council's schedule. Compare SeaTac (one extension) and Des Moines (“one or more”, no published limit).; THE APPLICATION HAS TWO SEPARATE CLOCKS. TMC 15.01.050(A): applications “for which no permit is issued within one hundred eighty days following the date of the application shall expire by limitation unless extended”, and (B) plans and other data for expired applications “may thereafter be returned to the applicant or destroyed by the building official in accordance with state law”. Separately, under (C), applications in review “shall be canceled for inactivity if an applicant fails to substantially respond within ninety days” to the building official's review comments.; TUMWATER NAMES 2021 THROUGHOUT AND PUTS NO ROLLING CLAUSE ON THE CODES — BUT IT DOES USE ROLLING LANGUAGE ELSEWHERE IN THE SAME TITLE, WHICH IS THE INFORMATIVE PART. Measured: a rolling-phrase search over Chapter 15.04 returns ZERO across all 7,888 characters, while the same pattern fires three times in Chapter 15.01 — so the instrument was demonstrably alive when it reported zero. ALL THREE HITS IN 15.01 ATTACH TO THE FEE SCHEDULE, NOT TO THE CODES: fees are “as currently adopted or as may be amended from time to time by resolution” (one hit is a false positive, “may thereafter be returned”). So within one title the drafter used a rolling formula for the money and withheld it from the codes. >>> TWO READINGS ARE RECORDED AND NEITHER IS ADJUDICATED. On its face this is named-and-static. But each adoption also reads “as amended by Chapter 51-xx WAC”, and that reference can be read as carrying a state chapter that does move. The contrast with the fee schedule is evidence a reader can weigh; it is not proof of intent and is not treated as such here. Maple Valley presents the same combination without the internal contrast.; A DEDICATED VESTING CHAPTER EXISTS AT TMC 15.44 “VESTING OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS”, alongside 15.48 Transportation Concurrency Requirements. Neither was opened for this entry and nothing here rests on them, but both bear directly on what rules a project is measured against and when.; TMC 15.01.100 is headed “Building code appeals – Hearing examiner”. This guide does not summarise it, so no deadline or procedure is stated here. Note that the model codes' own appeal sections — IBC 113 and IRC R112 — are expressly NOT adopted, so this section is the route.. If your project isn't listed, confirm with City of Tumwater at (360) 754-5855 before starting work.

    In Tumwater, the published Permit fee is: Set by city council resolution. Additional published fees: Refund of a paid fee — 100% if erroneous; 80% if no work done. These are the jurisdiction's own published figures — see the fee schedule table and source citations on this page.

    Tumwater does not publish a plan-review timeline for this permit. Contact City of Tumwater at (360) 754-5855 for current turnaround.

    You'll need: Building permit application; Current city council fee resolution. See the required-documents checklist on this page for details on each.

    Apply through City of Tumwater at 555 Israel Rd SW, Tumwater, WA 98501. Phone: (360) 754-5855. Official information: https://www.ci.tumwater.wa.us/.

    TMC 15.04.010 adopts Appendix Chapters E (Supplementary accessibility requirements), G (Flood resistant construction), H (Signs), I (Patio Covers) and J (Grading) — but Appendix H Sections H108, H109, H110 and H112 are expressly not adopted. The adoption also carries the International Existing Building Code, 2021 Edition, and ICC/ANSI A117.1-2017.

    Sources & verification

    Verified against official sources. Last reviewed 2026-09-16.

    Fees, timelines, and adopted codes are researched from each jurisdiction's published records — see how we verify. Requirements change and vary by project, so always confirm the current details with the Tumwater building department before you submit. PermitBase is an independent reference and is not affiliated with any government agency.

    This one’s complicated · Get an expediter

    Tell us about your project and we’ll connect you with a permit expediter who works in Tumwater.

    PermitBase may receive a referral fee from the expediter. This is a service introduction, not verified permit data or legal advice.

    Tumwater's permit history isn't searchable here yet

    This page covers what the permit requires. What we don't have for Tumwater yet is the record of permits actually issued — the history you'd search by street address. That is a gap in our coverage, not a statement about any particular property.

    Your email, and the place — never an address. We only use it to tell you when Tumwater lands. Privacy.