Skip to main content
PermitBase

What changed — page 23

Older changes to PermitBase’s verified permit dataset, newest first. The most recent changes are on the first page.

July 8, 2026

  • Timeline updated

    South Salt Lake, Utah — plan-review timeline record updated: 15–15 business days

  • Timeline updated

    Vineyard, Utah — plan-review timeline record updated: 7–7 business days

  • Timeline updated

    West Haven, Utah — plan-review timeline record updated: 14–14 business days

  • Timeline updated

    West Haven, Utah — plan-review timeline record updated: 14–14 business days

  • Timeline updated

    West Haven, Utah — plan-review timeline record updated: 14–14 business days

  • New jurisdictions

    4 new Utah jurisdictions: Unincorporated Carbon County, Unincorporated Emery County, Unincorporated Grand County, Unincorporated Summit County

  • New jurisdictions

    2 new Utah jurisdictions: Monticello, Park City

  • New jurisdictions

    4 new Utah jurisdictions: Hurricane, Ivins, Nibley, Santa Clara

  • New jurisdictions

    4 new Utah jurisdictions: Enoch City, Fruit Heights, La Verkin, West Bountiful

  • New jurisdictions

    4 new Utah jurisdictions: Unincorporated Beaver County, Unincorporated Garfield County, Unincorporated Millard County, Unincorporated Rich County

  • New jurisdictions

    4 new Utah jurisdictions: Unincorporated Duchesne County, Unincorporated Juab County, Morgan County, Unincorporated Uintah County

  • New jurisdictions

    4 new Utah jurisdictions: Unincorporated Kane County, Unincorporated San Juan County, Unincorporated Sanpete County, Unincorporated Sevier County

July 7, 2026

  • New jurisdictions

    7 new Arizona jurisdictions: Unincorporated La Paz County, Unincorporated Mohave County, Unincorporated Navajo County, Unincorporated Pinal County, Unincorporated Santa Cruz County, Unincorporated Yavapai County, Unincorporated Yuma County

  • Codes updated

    Saguache, Colorado — adopted-codes record updated

  • New jurisdictions

    6 new Arizona jurisdictions: Jerome, Tusayan, Wickenburg, Williams, Town of Winkelman, Youngtown

  • New jurisdictions

    4 new Utah jurisdictions: Moab, Nephi, Richfield, Vernal

  • New jurisdictions

    2 new Utah jurisdictions: Mapleton, Santaquin

  • Bulk update

    Review-timeline records re-verified across 145 jurisdictions

  • Bulk update

    Permit-type records re-verified across 10 jurisdictions

  • Codes updated

    Saguache, Colorado — adopted-codes record updated

    • + UPDATE (2026-07-07): the Town's Municode Chapter 18 — previously flagged as unreachable (see prior note below) — was successfully read directly via a live browser render (library.municode.com/co/saguache/codes/municipal_code?nodeId=CD_ORD_CH18BURE; the site is a client-rendered SPA that returns an empty shell to plain HTTP fetches/Wayback, which is why earlier non-browser attempts failed). 'CHAPTER 18 - Building Regulations' is codified through Ordinance No. 2023-2 (enacted March 13, 2023) and contains exactly three articles, none of which adopt a model construction code: Article 1 (Sec. 18-1-10 through 18-1-90), Dangerous Buildings — an unsafe-structure abatement/demolition procedure whose text references 'the adopted building code' only as hypothetical boilerplate (comparing a damaged structure's remaining strength to what a new building would need), never naming or adopting the IBC/IRC/any specific code; Article 2 (Sec. 18-2-10 through 18-2-80), Flood Damage Prevention — a FEMA/NFIP floodplain-management ordinance adopted under Title 29 C.R.S. authority, unrelated to general construction permitting (this corrects an earlier speculative title guess of 'Field Approval,' sourced only from search-engine snippets before this chapter could actually be read); Article 3 (Sec. 18-3-10 through 18-3-50), Manufactured Homes, Mobile Homes, Mobile Home Parks and RV Parks — zoning/prohibition rules, not a construction code adoption. This directly confirms, from the Town's own primary source rather than the third-party ColoradoEnergy.org directory alone, that the Town has NOT adopted the IBC/IRC or any other model building code.
    • + PRIOR NOTE (superseded by the UPDATE above, retained for audit trail): The Town's own currently codified Municipal Code (hosted on Municode Library, library.municode.com/co/saguache) does contain a 'CHAPTER 18 - Building Regulations' with at least an 'Article 2 - Field Approval' and an 'Article 3 - Manufactured Homes/Mobile Homes/Home Parks/Vacation Parks' (chapter/article titles confirmed via Municode's own site-indexed page titles across multiple independent search-engine queries). However, the verbatim text of Chapter 18 (including any fee schedule, permit-issuance procedure, or code-edition citation it may contain) could NOT be retrieved after exhausting every available recovery avenue: Municode's MunicodeNEXT platform serves this content exclusively via an authenticated Angular/API backend (library.municode.com/api and mcclibraryfunctions.azurewebsites.us/api both returned 401 Unauthorized to unauthenticated and referer-header requests); the Wayback Machine never captured real chapter content because Municode is a client-rendered SPA that legacy crawlers indexed as an empty shell (CDX lookups for library.municode.com/co/saguache* returned zero snapshots); Firecrawl (which can render JS) was unavailable due to exhausted account credits at time of this review; and Google/Bing search snippets surfaced only page titles, never body text, for this specific chapter.
    • − The Town's own currently codified Municipal Code (hosted on Municode Library, library.municode.com/co/saguache) does contain a 'CHAPTER 18 - Building Regulations' with at least an 'Article 2 - Field Approval' and an 'Article 3 - Manufactured Homes/Mobile Homes/Home Parks/Vacation Parks' (chapter/article titles confirmed via Municode's own site-indexed page titles across multiple independent search-engine queries). However, the verbatim text of Chapter 18 (including any fee schedule, permit-issuance procedure, or code-edition citation it may contain) could NOT be retrieved after exhausting every available recovery avenue: Municode's MunicodeNEXT platform serves this content exclusively via an authenticated Angular/API backend (library.municode.com/api and mcclibraryfunctions.azurewebsites.us/api both returned 401 Unauthorized to unauthenticated and referer-header requests); the Wayback Machine never captured real chapter content because Municode is a client-rendered SPA that legacy crawlers indexed as an empty shell (CDX lookups for library.municode.com/co/saguache* returned zero snapshots); Firecrawl (which can render JS) was unavailable due to exhausted account credits at time of this review; and Google/Bing search snippets surfaced only page titles, never body text, for this specific chapter. Given ColoradoEnergy.org's explicit, independently-sourced 'No Building Codes' finding, the balance of evidence is that Chapter 18 does not adopt a model building code (IBC/IRC) for general construction, and likely functions similarly to peer small-town Colorado jurisdictions in this corpus (e.g. Sedgwick) where a 'Building Regulations' chapter exists but does not incorporate the ICC family — but this inference about Chapter 18's specific content is NOT independently confirmed and is flagged as an open gap rather than asserted as fact.
  • New jurisdictions

    4 new Arizona jurisdictions: Clifton, Eloy, Kingman, Pima

  • New jurisdictions

    6 new Arizona jurisdictions: Unincorporated Apache County, Unincorporated Cochise County, Unincorporated Coconino County, Unincorporated Gila County, Unincorporated Graham County, Unincorporated Greenlee County

  • Timeline updated

    Tusayan, Arizona — plan-review timeline record updated: 36–56 business days

  • Timeline updated

    Tusayan, Arizona — plan-review timeline record updated: 36–56 business days

  • Timeline updated

    Tusayan, Arizona — plan-review timeline record updated: 36–56 business days

  • Timeline updated

    Tusayan, Arizona — plan-review timeline record updated: 36–56 business days

  • Timeline updated

    Tusayan, Arizona — plan-review timeline record updated: 36–56 business days

  • Timeline updated

    Tusayan, Arizona — plan-review timeline record updated: 36–56 business days

  • Timeline updated

    Tusayan, Arizona — plan-review timeline record updated: 36–56 business days

  • New jurisdictions

    3 new Idaho jurisdictions: Driggs, Priest River, Victor

  • New jurisdictions

    4 new Arizona jurisdictions: Ak-Chin Indian Community, Colorado River Indian Tribes, Gila River Indian Community, Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community

  • New jurisdictions

    1 new Idaho jurisdictions: Worley

  • New jurisdictions

    2 new Idaho jurisdictions: Harrison, Spirit Lake

  • New jurisdictions

    2 new Utah jurisdictions: Farr West, Plain City

  • Codes updated

    Unincorporated Washington County, Colorado — adopted-codes record updated

    • + No model building code (IBC/IRC/NEC) found published online — see the FAQ below for what governs instead
    • + Manufactured/mobile homes: Colorado Division of Housing state standards apply, not a county-adopted code
    • + County Zoning Resolution is in force but not published online — full scope on this point unconfirmed
    • − IMPORTANT CAVEAT (found on a deeper re-chase): Washington County DOES have a standing 'Zoning Resolution' as a legally operative instrument — confirmed by the County's own 'Minutes of the Annual Reorganization Meeting of the Board of County Commissioners,' January 10, 2023 (a scanned 31-page PDF, archived at washingtoncounty.colorado.gov/sites/washingtoncounty/files/Reorganization%20Resoutions%201-47.pdf, retrieved via Wayback since the live 2023-resolutions page itself is unarchived at that specific file but the parent listing is), which states verbatim: 'In relation to existing Zoning Resolutions duly adopted prior to the year 2006, wherein any such provisions contained therein relating to policies, procedures and/or mandates conflict with current Zoning regulations, those provisions are hereby acknowledged to be outdated and by the adoption of this Resolution are hereby declared to be null, void and of no effect.' This confirms a currently-operative Zoning Resolution exists (superseding pre-2006 provisions) — but its full text is NOT published anywhere online: not linked from the current or 2020-archived Planning & Zoning page, not in the (empty) live Ordinances page, not in any of the 2022-2026 Resolutions archive pages (checked live/Wayback for all 5 years — none list a 'Zoning Resolution' or 'Zoning Regulations' file), and not found via a direct web search for the exact phrase. The three permit-application forms and the Master Plan (see below) remain the only Washington County documents this file could directly read. Net effect: this file cannot confirm or rule out whether the (unpublished) Zoning Resolution itself incorporates a building code by reference — the 'no evidence of an adopted model code' finding below is bounded by 'no evidence found in every document actually reachable online,' not an affirmative confirmation that the Zoning Resolution contains no such reference. Applicants relying on code specifics for a real project should confirm directly with the Land Use Office, (970) 345-2701 ext. 234, and request to review the Zoning Resolution in person.
    • − Within that bound, no evidence of a locally adopted model building code (IBC, IRC, IPC, IMC, IFGC, IECC, or NEC, any edition) was found for Washington County's unincorporated area after directly reading all three of the County's own permit-application documents (Building Permit Application Rev. 06-14; Foundation Permit for Manufactured Homes Rev. 09-12; Mobile or Manufactured Home Permit Application Rev. 09-12, all 7 pages including the attached 'Additional Criteria' instructions) plus the County's own live Ordinances page (washingtoncounty.colorado.gov/ordinances), which as of verification shows a single '2025' accordion entry with zero documents published under it.
    • − The general Building Permit Application collects zoning/placement information only — legal description (section/township/range), road access, class of work, construction materials, whether the structure sits on a permanent foundation, intended use, size, sewer facility, and water source — with no reference anywhere on the form to a specific code section, plan-review checklist, or adopted edition year. This is the same zoning/placement-compliance pattern (rather than ICC-code-based plan review) already documented for other rural Eastern Plains Colorado jurisdictions in this corpus (e.g. Burlington, Town of Sedgwick).
    • − For mobile/manufactured homes specifically, installation and inspection standards are set by the State of Colorado Division of Housing, NOT a county-adopted code — the County's own 'Additional Criteria for Mobile or Manufactured Home Permits' sheet states verbatim: 'The State of Colorado has requirements for locating and setting a mobile home or a manufactured home within any jurisdiction of the State as stated in resolution 38 under Division of Housing, including Rules and Regulations. These requirements are not imposed by Washington County but the County must adhere to these regulations.' The County collects the state fee and arranges the state-required inspection/insignia; it does not enforce its own separate manufactured-home code.
    • − This resolves an open lead flagged at the close of this corpus's S114 Colorado full-universe session: Washington County's own Land Use Office DOES issue building permits for the unincorporated portion of the county (confirmed live, current webpage, current forms) — contradicting an earlier premise that the county had no building department. It is a genuine, active, if code-light, permitting authority, not a null case.
    • − The County's 'Master Plan.pdf' (linked from the Planning & Zoning page) was directly opened and read (43-page scanned PDF, rendered to PNG at 200 dpi since it is a pre-2010 fax-scanned document with no extractable text layer) — it is the Washington County Comprehensive Land Use Plan, approved by the Planning Commission September 16, 2002 (Resolution 2002-01), a policy document covering land-use categories (Agricultural, Residential, Retail Commercial, Office/Light Industrial, Industrial, Feedlots) and development goals/objectives. It contains no building-code text, code-adoption clause, or reference to any IBC/IRC/IECC/NEC edition — confirmed directly rather than assumed from its title.
  • New jurisdictions

    4 new Utah jurisdictions: Pleasant View, Riverdale, Washington Terrace, West Point

  • New jurisdictions

    3 new Idaho jurisdictions: Cascade, Donnelly, Ketchum

  • New jurisdictions

    4 new Utah jurisdictions: Highland, South Salt Lake, Syracuse, Vineyard

  • New jurisdictions

    4 new Idaho jurisdictions: Unincorporated Bingham County, Unincorporated Cassia County, Unincorporated Jefferson County, Unincorporated Madison County

  • New jurisdictions

    1 new Arizona jurisdictions: Tohono O'odham Nation

  • New jurisdictions

    3 new Idaho jurisdictions: American Falls, Buhl, Kimberly

  • New jurisdictions

    4 new Utah jurisdictions: Grantsville, Price, Tremonton, Woods Cross

  • New jurisdictions

    3 new Utah jurisdictions: Brigham City, Centerville, North Ogden

  • New jurisdictions

    4 new Utah jurisdictions: Alpine, Cedar Hills, Lindon, North Logan

  • New jurisdictions

    3 new Idaho jurisdictions: Grangeville, Idaho City, Plummer

  • New jurisdictions

    4 new Idaho jurisdictions: Greenleaf, Melba, Notus, Wilder

  • New jurisdictions

    3 new Idaho jurisdictions: Emmett, Hailey, McCall

  • New jurisdictions

    4 new Idaho jurisdictions: Unincorporated Bonneville County, Unincorporated Gem County, Unincorporated Power County, Unincorporated Valley County

  • New jurisdictions

    3 new Idaho jurisdictions: Unincorporated Bannock County, Unincorporated Elmore County, Unincorporated Twin Falls County

  • New jurisdictions

    10 new Arizona jurisdictions: Parker, Pinetop-Lakeside, Quartzsite, Snowflake, South Tucson, Springerville, Taylor, Thatcher, and 2 more

  • New jurisdictions

    3 new Utah jurisdictions: Heber City, South Ogden, West Haven

  • New jurisdictions

    3 new Idaho jurisdictions: Kellogg, Osburn, Wallace

  • New jurisdictions

    3 new Arizona jurisdictions: Kayenta Township, San Carlos Apache Tribe, Yavapai-Apache Nation

  • New jurisdictions

    4 new Arizona jurisdictions: Cocopah Indian Tribe, Fort McDowell Yavapai Nation, Fort Mojave Indian Tribe, Hualapai Tribe

  • New jurisdictions

    3 new Idaho jurisdictions: Fruitland, Payette, Shelley

  • New jurisdictions

    4 new Idaho jurisdictions: Malad City, Rigby, Salmon, Soda Springs

July 6, 2026

  • New jurisdictions

    5 new Colorado jurisdictions: Eaton, Evans, Mead, Milliken, Timnath

  • New jurisdictions

    3 new Colorado jurisdictions: Calhan, Silver Cliff, Westcliffe

  • New jurisdictions

    5 new Colorado jurisdictions: Lafayette, Littleton, Louisville, Northglenn, Wheat Ridge

  • New jurisdictions

    10 new Arizona jurisdictions: Camp Verde, Chino Valley, Clarkdale, Colorado City, Dewey-Humboldt, Duncan, Eagar, Fredonia, and 2 more

  • New jurisdictions

    6 new Colorado jurisdictions: Blue River, Fruita, La Junta, Mountain Village, Palisade, Poncha Springs

  • New jurisdictions

    5 new Colorado jurisdictions: Bow Mar, Cripple Creek, Florence, Unincorporated Teller County, Victor

  • New jurisdictions

    5 new Colorado jurisdictions: Alamosa, Cañon City, Delta, Fort Morgan, Rifle

  • New jurisdictions

    10 new Arizona jurisdictions: Apache Junction, Avondale, Bullhead City, Casa Grande, Douglas, Florence, Fountain Hills, Lake Havasu City, and 2 more

  • New jurisdictions

    3 new Colorado jurisdictions: Center, Julesburg, Sedgwick

  • New jurisdictions

    5 new Colorado jurisdictions: Berthoud, Dacono, Fort Lupton, Lochbuie, Platteville

  • New jurisdictions

    5 new Colorado jurisdictions: Breckenridge, Dillon, Frisco, Silverthorne, Vail

  • New jurisdictions

    5 new Colorado jurisdictions: Gilcrest, Hudson, Keenesburg, La Salle, Nunn

  • New jurisdictions

    5 new Colorado jurisdictions: Ault, Frederick, Kersey, Pierce, Severance

  • New jurisdictions

    4 new Colorado jurisdictions: Cheyenne Wells, Saguache, Springfield, Walsh

  • New jurisdictions

    1 new Colorado jurisdictions: Unincorporated Washington County

  • New jurisdictions

    5 new Colorado jurisdictions: Aspen, Avon, Durango, Eagle, Gypsum

  • New jurisdictions

    5 new Colorado jurisdictions: Erie, Firestone, Johnstown, Superior, Windsor

  • New jurisdictions

    5 new Colorado jurisdictions: Crested Butte, Estes Park, Glenwood Springs, Montrose, Winter Park

  • New jurisdictions

    3 new Colorado jurisdictions: Burlington, Lamar, Yuma

  • New jurisdictions

    5 new Colorado jurisdictions: Cortez, Salida, Steamboat Springs, Telluride, Trinidad

  • New jurisdictions

    3 new Colorado jurisdictions: Akron, Haxtun, Holyoke

  • New jurisdictions

    10 new Arizona jurisdictions: Nogales, Oro Valley, Town of Payson, Prescott, Prescott Valley, Queen Creek, Sahuarita, Sedona, and 2 more

  • Codes updated

    Unincorporated Washington County, Colorado — adopted-codes record updated

    • + IMPORTANT CAVEAT (found on a deeper re-chase): Washington County DOES have a standing 'Zoning Resolution' as a legally operative instrument — confirmed by the County's own 'Minutes of the Annual Reorganization Meeting of the Board of County Commissioners,' January 10, 2023 (a scanned 31-page PDF, archived at washingtoncounty.colorado.gov/sites/washingtoncounty/files/Reorganization%20Resoutions%201-47.pdf, retrieved via Wayback since the live 2023-resolutions page itself is unarchived at that specific file but the parent listing is), which states verbatim: 'In relation to existing Zoning Resolutions duly adopted prior to the year 2006, wherein any such provisions contained therein relating to policies, procedures and/or mandates conflict with current Zoning regulations, those provisions are hereby acknowledged to be outdated and by the adoption of this Resolution are hereby declared to be null, void and of no effect.' This confirms a currently-operative Zoning Resolution exists (superseding pre-2006 provisions) — but its full text is NOT published anywhere online: not linked from the current or 2020-archived Planning & Zoning page, not in the (empty) live Ordinances page, not in any of the 2022-2026 Resolutions archive pages (checked live/Wayback for all 5 years — none list a 'Zoning Resolution' or 'Zoning Regulations' file), and not found via a direct web search for the exact phrase. The three permit-application forms and the Master Plan (see below) remain the only Washington County documents this file could directly read. Net effect: this file cannot confirm or rule out whether the (unpublished) Zoning Resolution itself incorporates a building code by reference — the 'no evidence of an adopted model code' finding below is bounded by 'no evidence found in every document actually reachable online,' not an affirmative confirmation that the Zoning Resolution contains no such reference. Applicants relying on code specifics for a real project should confirm directly with the Land Use Office, (970) 345-2701 ext. 234, and request to review the Zoning Resolution in person.
    • + Within that bound, no evidence of a locally adopted model building code (IBC, IRC, IPC, IMC, IFGC, IECC, or NEC, any edition) was found for Washington County's unincorporated area after directly reading all three of the County's own permit-application documents (Building Permit Application Rev. 06-14; Foundation Permit for Manufactured Homes Rev. 09-12; Mobile or Manufactured Home Permit Application Rev. 09-12, all 7 pages including the attached 'Additional Criteria' instructions) plus the County's own live Ordinances page (washingtoncounty.colorado.gov/ordinances), which as of verification shows a single '2025' accordion entry with zero documents published under it.
    • + The County's 'Master Plan.pdf' (linked from the Planning & Zoning page) was directly opened and read (43-page scanned PDF, rendered to PNG at 200 dpi since it is a pre-2010 fax-scanned document with no extractable text layer) — it is the Washington County Comprehensive Land Use Plan, approved by the Planning Commission September 16, 2002 (Resolution 2002-01), a policy document covering land-use categories (Agricultural, Residential, Retail Commercial, Office/Light Industrial, Industrial, Feedlots) and development goals/objectives. It contains no building-code text, code-adoption clause, or reference to any IBC/IRC/IECC/NEC edition — confirmed directly rather than assumed from its title.
    • + HB22-1362 (2022, Colorado's statewide model energy/low-carbon code law) population-based carve-out analysis: unincorporated Washington County's population is approximately 3,060 (county total 4,817 per 2020 Census, minus Akron's 1,757 — Akron is the only incorporated municipality in the county per this corpus's counties.json), which is ABOVE the law's 2,500-resident exemption threshold, so the population carve-out alone would not exempt the county. HB22-1362's model-code mandate is triggered only when a jurisdiction adopts or updates a building code; within the bound of what this file could actually read online, no building code (energy or otherwise) was found to have been affirmatively adopted, so no adoption/update event was found for the law's mandate to attach to. Given the unpublished-Zoning-Resolution caveat above, this is stated as 'no trigger event found' rather than an affirmative certainty that none exists. Re-check if the County adopts any future code, or if the Zoning Resolution's actual text is obtained and found to reference one — either would trigger the law's Model Low Energy and Carbon Code requirement (binding on any update after July 1, 2026).
    • − No evidence of a locally adopted model building code (IBC, IRC, IPC, IMC, IFGC, IECC, or NEC, any edition) was found for Washington County's unincorporated area after directly reading all three of the County's own permit-application documents (Building Permit Application Rev. 06-14; Foundation Permit for Manufactured Homes Rev. 09-12; Mobile or Manufactured Home Permit Application Rev. 09-12, all 7 pages including the attached 'Additional Criteria' instructions) plus the County's own live Ordinances page (washingtoncounty.colorado.gov/ordinances), which as of verification shows a single '2025' accordion entry with zero documents published under it.
  • New jurisdictions

    4 new Colorado jurisdictions: Brighton, Federal Heights, Garden City, Wellington

  • New jurisdictions

    9 new Arizona jurisdictions: Carefree, Cave Creek, City of Globe, Guadalupe, Holbrook, Litchfield Park, Page, Safford, and 1 more

  • New jurisdictions

    5 new Colorado jurisdictions: Bennett, Castle Pines, Larkspur, Lyons, Nederland

  • New jurisdictions

    5 new Colorado jurisdictions: Columbine Valley, Edgewater, Lone Tree, Morrison, Mountain View

  • New jurisdictions

    10 new Arizona jurisdictions: Benson, Bisbee, Coolidge, Cottonwood, El Mirage, Paradise Valley, San Luis, Somerton, and 2 more

  • New jurisdictions

    5 new Colorado jurisdictions: Basalt, Conejos County (Unincorporated), Craig, Mount Crested Butte, Sterling

July 5, 2026

  • Fee updated

    Lakewood, Colorado — Roofing Permit (Reroof) fee record updated: $80.00 → $110.00

  • Fee updated

    Westminster, Colorado — Roofing Permit (Reroof) fee record updated: $80.00 → $100.00

  • New jurisdictions

    1 new Montana jurisdictions: City of Deer Lodge

  • New jurisdictions

    5 new Colorado jurisdictions: Castle Rock, Commerce City, Golden, Parker, Unincorporated Pueblo County

  • New jurisdictions

    4 new New Mexico jurisdictions: Village of Corrales, Town of Taos, Unincorporated Doña Ana County, Unincorporated San Juan County

July 4, 2026

  • New jurisdictions

    5 new Utah jurisdictions: Cedar City, Cottonwood Heights, Pleasant Grove, Roy, Tooele

  • New jurisdictions

    5 new Nevada jurisdictions: Carlin, Unincorporated Elko County, Unincorporated Lincoln County, Wells, West Wendover

  • New jurisdictions

    7 new Idaho jurisdictions: Burley, Lewiston, Moscow, Unincorporated Franklin County, Unincorporated Latah County, Minidoka County (Building Authority for Unincorporated County and the Cities of Acequia, Minidoka, Paul, and Rupert), Unincorporated Nez Perce County

  • New jurisdictions

    5 new Idaho jurisdictions: Blackfoot, Middleton, Mountain Home, Rathdrum, Sandpoint

  • New jurisdictions

    5 new Utah jurisdictions: Clearfield, Farmington, Holladay, Kaysville, Washington City

  • New jurisdictions

    10 new jurisdictions across Utah and Nevada: American Fork, Ely, Unincorporated Humboldt County, Midvale, Murray, Saratoga Springs, Springville, Unincorporated White Pine County, and 2 more

  • New jurisdictions

    5 new Nevada jurisdictions: Unincorporated Churchill County, Lander County (including Battle Mountain), Unincorporated Mineral County, Pershing County (includes Lovelock), Storey County (includes Virginia City)

  • New jurisdictions

    5 new Utah jurisdictions: Clinton, North Salt Lake, Payson, Unincorporated Iron County, Unincorporated Tooele County

  • New jurisdictions

    11 new Montana jurisdictions: Colstrip, Forsyth, Missoula County (Unincorporated), Pondera County (Unincorporated), Richland County (Unincorporated Areas and Towns, excluding Sidney), Sidney, Stevensville, Toole County (Unincorporated), and 3 more

  • New jurisdictions

    2 new Utah jurisdictions: Unincorporated Box Elder County, Unincorporated Wasatch County

  • New jurisdictions

    5 new Montana jurisdictions: Hardin, Libby, Polson, Ronan, Shelby

  • New jurisdictions

    5 new Idaho jurisdictions: Ammon, Chubbuck, Hayden, Jerome, Rexburg

  • New jurisdictions

    2 new Idaho jurisdictions: Heyburn, Preston

July 3, 2026

  • Timeline updated

    Albuquerque, New Mexico — plan-review timeline record updated: not published by the jurisdiction

  • New jurisdictions

    36 new jurisdictions across Montana, Nevada, Colorado, Arizona, New Mexico, and Idaho: Belgrade, Boulder City, Broomfield, Buckeye, Carlsbad, Centennial, Coeur d'Alene, Columbia Falls, and 28 more

  • New jurisdictions

    5 new Montana jurisdictions: Choteau, Darby, East Helena, Hamilton, Manhattan

  • New jurisdictions

    5 new Montana jurisdictions: Conrad, Cut Bank, Glasgow, Lewistown, Red Lodge

  • Bulk update

    Review-timeline records re-verified across 22 jurisdictions

  • Codes updated

    Carlsbad, New Mexico — adopted-codes record updated

    • + The City's Code of Ordinances, Chapter 8 ('Buildings and Building Regulations'), is the local ordinance chapter under which building permitting and the City's Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance are codified. It was retrieved in full this pass via Municode's public content API (api.municode.com/CodesContent?nodeId=COOR_CH8BUBURE&productId=12431) -- all 70 sections reviewed. Sec. 8-1 adopts the New Mexico state-cycle codes 'as published, adopted, and amended by the State of New Mexico Administrative Code'; Sec. 8-26 references an older 1991 UBC adoption and Sec. 8-27 amends building-permit fees to 50% of UBC Table 3-A; Article V (Secs. 8-101 to 8-137) is the City's Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance. As codified, Sec. 8-1 still enumerates 2009/2014-edition code names, but by its own 'as amended by the state from time to time' language and NMSA 1978 SS 60-13-41/60-13-44, the operative statewide-minimum codes are the current NMAC 14.7-14.10 cycle Carlsbad must enforce. Chapter 8 contains no plan-review turnaround deadline for any trade. The City's permit-issuance practice, application forms, and fee reports (e-Gov FAQ, Building Permit Application PDF, monthly Building Activity/Fee Reports) independently corroborate the self-administration finding.
    • − The City's Code of Ordinances, Chapter 8 ('Buildings and Building Regulations'), is the local ordinance chapter under which building permitting and the City's Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance are codified; the chapter is published via Municode but is only accessible through Municode's JavaScript-rendered viewer (library.municode.com/nm/carlsbad) -- the underlying adoption-ordinance text (e.g., specific local amendments to the 2021-cycle codes, if any) could not be independently retrieved in this pass because the shared Playwright browser used for JS-rendered civic sites was continuously locked by a concurrent session throughout this research window, and Municode's site returns only an empty Angular app shell to non-browser fetches (curl, WebFetch, and a Wayback Machine snapshot of the same URL all returned the unrendered app shell, not the code text). Recovery avenues exhausted for this pass: direct curl with browser headers/referer (blocked by Akamai edgesuite.net bot-challenge, HTTP 403), WebFetch (same 403), Wayback Machine cached snapshot (same unrendered shell), and Municode's internal JSON API (401, requires session auth not replicable via curl). This omission is flagged rather than invented; the City's own permit-issuance practice, application forms, and fee schedule (independently confirmed via the City's e-Gov FAQ, Building Permit Application PDF, and monthly Building Activity/Fee Reports) fully substantiate the self-administration finding above regardless of the exact Chapter 8 ordinance text
  • Codes updated

    Kootenai County, Idaho — adopted-codes record updated

    • + Idaho has a mandatory statewide baseline building code under the Idaho Building Code Act (Idaho Code Title 39, Chapter 41), with local jurisdictions authorized to adopt and administer their own building regulations under Idaho Code Title 39, Chapter 41 and Title 31, Chapter 7, and Article 12, Section 2 of the Idaho Constitution. Kootenai County Community Development (the Building Division, formerly the Kootenai County Building and Planning Department) administers building codes for the UNINCORPORATED area of Kootenai County only — incorporated cities within the county (Coeur d'Alene, Post Falls, Hayden, Rathdrum, Athol, Dalton Gardens, Harrison, Spirit Lake, Worley) have their own separate building departments and codes. Source: Kootenai County Code Title 7, Chapter 1, Section 7.1.102 (Authority) and 7.1.103 (Applicability), https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/kootenaicountyid/latest/kootenaicounty_id/0-0-0-2406
    • − Idaho has a mandatory statewide baseline building code under the Idaho Building Code Act (Idaho Code Title 39, Chapter 41), with local jurisdictions authorized to adopt and administer their own building regulations under Idaho Code Title 39, Chapter 41 and Title 31, Chapter 7, and Article 12, Section 2 of the Idaho Constitution. Kootenai County Community Development (the Building Division, formerly the Kootenai County Building and Planning Department) administers building codes for the UNINCORPORATED area of Kootenai County only — incorporated cities within the county (Coeur d'Alene, Post Falls, Hayden, Rathdrum, Athol, Dalton Gardens, Harrison, Spirit Lake, Worley) have their own separate building departments and codes. Source: Kootenai County Code Title 7, Chapter 1, Section 7.1.102 (Authority) and 7.1.103 (Applicability), http://ftp.kcgov.us/files/commdev/Title7Chapter1Ord.pdf
  • Fee updated

    Pocatello, Idaho — Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) Permit fee record added: Land-Use Application Fee — Administrative Review (staff level review), AAA/ADU ($50)

  • Fee updated

    Pocatello, Idaho — Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) Permit fee record removed: Land-Use Application Fee (Planning & Development Services)

July 2, 2026

  • Fee updated

    Reno, Nevada — Swimming Pool and Spa Permit fee record updated: Varies — valuation-based (construction cost); application $45.00 + valuation-based permit fee + plan review fee (valuation-based per the Permit Fee Table Schedule) + permit issuance $45.00 → Varies — valuation-based (construction cost); application $45.00 + valuation-based permit fee + plan review (65% of permit fee) + permit issuance $45.00

  • Permit type added

    Sandy, Utah — Single-Family New Construction record added

  • Permit type removed

    Sandy, Utah — Single-Family New Construction record removed

  • New jurisdictions

    10 new Montana jurisdictions: Anaconda-Deer Lodge, Billings, Bozeman, Butte-Silver Bow, Great Falls, Havre, Helena, Kalispell, and 2 more

  • Permit type added

    Orem, Utah — Residential Building Permit record added

  • Fee updated

    Orem, Utah — Residential Building Permit fee record added: Plan Review — Fast Track, Commercial (project value under $5M) ($811.00 minimum + $88.00/hr if over 4 hours)

  • Fee updated

    Orem, Utah — Residential Building Permit fee record added: Plan Review — Fast Track, Residential ($291.00 minimum + $88.00/hr if over 2 hours)

  • Fee updated

    Orem, Utah — Residential Building Permit fee record added: Inspections Outside Normal Working Hours ($151.00 + $88.00/hr if over 2 hours)

  • Fee updated

    Orem, Utah — Residential Building Permit fee record added: Building Without a Permit (Double the building permit fee (including plumbing, electrical, and mechanical))

  • Fee updated

    Orem, Utah — Residential Building Permit fee record added: Temporary Certificate of Occupancy — Commercial ($390.00 (non-refundable))

  • Permit type removed

    Orem, Utah — Residential Building Permit record removed

  • New jurisdictions

    10 new New Mexico jurisdictions: Alamogordo, Albuquerque, Clovis, Farmington, Hobbs, Las Cruces, Rio Rancho, Roswell, and 2 more

  • Fee updated

    Jackson, Wyoming — Mechanical / Fuel Gas Permit fee record updated: $129.00 → $23.00